The books of the Apocrypha : $b their origin, teaching and contentsOesterley, W. O. E. (William Oscar Emil)
Religion
The books of the Apocrypha : $b their origin, teaching and contents
Oesterley, W. O. E. (William Oscar Emil)
Bible. Apocrypha -- Introductions
From these passages we gather that Scribes were in existence before
the Exile, that they claimed to be wise, and that they regarded
themselves as authorities on the Law of the Lord; they are censured
by Jeremiah with having “wrought falsely,” and the context points to
this as being connected with the “Law of the Lord”; what precisely
is referred to is not easy to determine, but the point of importance
for us is that the pre-exilic Scribes were occupied with the Law;
if they come under the lash of Jeremiah they do not differ in this
respect from the wise men, nor yet from the priests and the prophets
(see viii. 10). In Jeremiah xxxvi. mention is made of Scribes in
influential positions; but in addition to these there is Baruch, who
belongs to a different category of Scribe, for he makes copies of
what are clearly regarded as sacred writings (see verses 24, 25).
From the meagre evidence we possess there is not much to be gathered;
but we may perhaps be justified in saying that already in pre-exilic
times the term “Scribes” was beginning to be used as a technical
term in the limited sense of their being those whose special duty it
was to make copies of the Law in the form in which it then existed.
But in saying that the term “Scribes” was used in a technical sense
already in this pre-exilic period we must very strongly emphasize
that this is to be understood in an entirely different sense from
that in which it was used as a technical term in post-exilic times.
There is a world of difference between the Scribe who is the more or
less officially accredited copier of the text of the Law or other
Scriptures, and the Scribe who also interprets the Law, teaches it to
the people, and in whom is vested the judicial power of enforcing its
decrees. In each case “Scribe” may be used as a technical term while
connoting two very different things.
Further, from the second of the passages quoted above we see that
three distinct classes are mentioned, viz., the priests, the wise men
or _Chakamim_, and the prophets. There can be no doubt that these
three were in existence long before Scribes in the technical sense
were heard of; with the prophets we are not concerned here, for
their activity lay in a different sphere altogether; but we must try
and get some clear ideas upon the subject of the relationship between
the Scribes and the priests on the one hand, and the Scribes and the
_Chakamim_ on the other.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account