III. WESTERN LISTS--
(a) _Italy._
Muratorian, A.D. 180 . . . . * * *
Hippolytus, A.D. 220 . . . . * ( ) *
(b) _Gaul._
Irenaeus, A.D. 180 . . . . . * * *
(c) _Roman Africa._
Tertullian, A.D. 200 . . . . * * *
[1] _Inspiration_, p. 368.
{223}
CHAPTER XX
THE GENERAL EPISTLE OF JAMES
[Sidenote: The Author]
In the 4th century this Epistle was reckoned among the authentic
documents of the apostolic period. It does not seem to have been
universally known in the Church at an earlier period. It is not in the
_Muratorian Fragment_. But it is plainly quoted by Irenaeus, though he
does not mention the author's name. The same is true with regard to
the _Shepherd_ of Hermas, which was written at Rome about A.D. 140.
Justin Martyr quotes the words "the devils shudder" (James ii. 19,
_Trypho_, 49). Polycarp seems to quote James i. 27, and 1 Peter seems
to show traces of its influence. The first writer who both quotes it
and mentions the author is Origen.
It opens with the name of "James, a servant of God and of the Lord
Jesus Christ." There can be no reasonable doubt that this is James
"the Lord's brother." James the son of Zebedee was killed as early as
A.D. 44, before which date it is unlikely that the Epistle was written.
We have no reason to attribute the Epistle to the Apostle James "the
Little." He does not seem to have been of sufficient prominence to
write an authoritative letter "to the twelve tribes which are of the
Dispersion." But such an action would have been exceedingly natural on
the part of a saint who was bishop of "the mother of Churches,"
Jerusalem itself. It will be convenient to postpone the consideration
of such evidence as we possess for the foregoing conclusion until we
have discussed the exact relation of St. James to our Lord.
{224}
Three important theories must be mentioned as offering a solution of
the difficult problem as to this relationship--
(a) That James, Joses, Simon, and Jude, mentioned in the Gospels as the
"brethren" of our Lord, were His first cousins on His mother's side.
(b) That they were the children of Joseph and Mary.
(c) That they were the children of Joseph by a former wife.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive