The boy's Froissart : $b being Sir John Froissart's Chronicles of adventures, battle, and custom in England, France, Spain, etc.Froissart, Jean
History
The boy's Froissart : $b being Sir John Froissart's Chronicles of adventures, battle, and custom in England, France, Spain, etc.
Froissart, Jean
France -- History -- House of Valois, 1328-1589; Great Britain -- History -- 14th century; Hundred Years' War, 1339-1453
The king returned to his lords, and asked them what should next be done.
He was advised to make for the fields; for the mayor said that “to
retreat or fly would be of no avail. It is proper we should act thus,
for I reckon that we shall very soon receive assistance from
London,--that is, from our good friends who are prepared and armed, with
all their servants in their houses.” While things remained in this
state, several ran to London, and cried out, “They are killing the king!
They are killing the king and our mayor!” Upon this alarm every man of
the king’s party sallied out toward Smithfield and to the fields whither
the king had retreated; and there were instantly collected from seven to
eight thousand men in arms.
Among the first came Sir Robert Knolles and Sir Perducas d’Albreth well
attended; and several of the aldermen with upward of six hundred men at
arms, and a powerful man of the city called Nicholas Bramber, the king’s
draper, bringing with him a large force, who, as they came up, ranged
themselves in order on foot on each side of him. The rebels were drawn
up opposite them: they had the king’s banners, and showed as if they
intended to maintain their ground by offering combat. The king created
three knights: Sir William Walworth, mayor of London, Sir John
Standwich, and Sir Nicholas Bramber. The lords began to converse among
themselves, saying, “What shall we do? We see our enemies, who would
willingly have murdered us if they had gained the upper hand.” Sir
Robert Knowles advised immediately to fall on them and slay them; but
the king would not consent, saying, “I will not have you act thus: you
shall go and demand from them my banners. We shall see how they will
behave when you make this demand, for I will have them by fair or foul
means.”--“It is a good thought,” replied the Earl of Salisbury.
The new knights were therefore sent, who, on approaching, made signs for
them not to shoot, as they wished to speak with them. When they had come
near enough to be heard, they said, “Now attend: the king orders you to
send back his banners, and we hope he will have mercy on you.” The
banners were directly given up, and brought to the king. It was then
ordered, under pain of death, that all those who had obtained the king’s
letters should deliver them up. Some did so, but not all. The king, on
receiving them, had them torn in their presence. You must know that from
the instant when the king’s banners were surrendered these fellows kept
no order; but the greater part, throwing their bows to the ground, took
to their heels, and returned to London.
Sir Robert Knolles was in a violent rage that they were not attacked,
and the whole of them slain; but the king would not consent to it,
saying he would have ample revenge on them,--which in truth he
afterwards had.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account