The Boy Travellers in the Far East, Part Fourth: Adventures of Two Youths in a Journey to Egypt and the Holy LandKnox, Thomas Wallace
General
The Boy Travellers in the Far East, Part Fourth: Adventures of Two Youths in a Journey to Egypt and the Holy Land
Knox, Thomas Wallace
Egypt -- Description and travel -- Juvenile literature; Palestine -- Description and travel -- Juvenile literature
"The history of ancient Egypt is full of interest, and has been a
subject of a great deal of study by many learned writers. Herodotus, who
has been called 'the father of history,' and flourished in the fifth
century before the Christian era, was the first of these writers, and
some of the discoveries of the present time have been based on his
records. Another Greek writer, Manetho, lived two centuries later than
Herodotus, but, unfortunately, the greater part of his works have not
come down to us. A large part of the history of ancient Egypt has been
obtained from the inscriptions on the walls of the temples and tombs,
and from the writings upon papyrus scrolls, and the linen in which
mummies were rolled. In modern times there have been many explorers and
writers who have devoted years of study to the subject, and consequently
we know more of ancient Egypt than of any other country of antiquity. If
you wish to know more than we can tell you now about the people that
lived here four thousand years ago, we refer you to the works of
Wilkinson, Poole, Mariette, Lepsius, Belzoni, Bunsen, Brugsch, and many
others. There are books enough on Egypt to keep you busy a whole year,
and perhaps two years, just to read them through. We are reading 'The
Ancient Egyptians,' by Sir Gardner Wilkinson, and find it very
interesting.
[Illustration: MENES.]
"The first King of Egypt that we know about was Menes, who founded the
City of Memphis. There is a difference of opinion among the writers as
to the date when he existed; Wilkinson, Poole, and others say he lived
about 2700 B.C., Bunsen says it was 3623 B.C., and Mariette thinks it
was 5004 B.C. The reason why they make this difference is because some
of them believe the dynasties, or families of kings, of ancient Egypt
succeeded one another, while others believe some of them ruled at the
same time in different parts of the country. The difference between the
'successive' and the 'contemporaneous' theories, when you add up the
periods of all the dynasties, is more than two thousand years. Down to
the seventeenth dynasty the figures are uncertain; from the seventeenth
to the twenty-first it is agreed that the dynasties were successive, but
there is some difference about their dates; while from the twenty-first
dynasty to the Christian era there is no dispute.
"Perhaps this is dry reading; if so, you had better go over it
carefully, and then skip.
"Whether King Menes lived seven or five thousand years ago makes very
little difference to us, and probably to him, as he is dead now. To
avoid confusion we will take the theory of Wilkinson, and suppose it was
only five thousand years ago that the first dynasty began. That will
seem more neighborly, and bring us so near to Menes that we can almost
imagine we knew him personally. Just think of it--only five thousand
years ago!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account