The boys' life of EdisonMeadowcroft, Wm. H. (William Henry)
General
The boys' life of Edison
Meadowcroft, Wm. H. (William Henry)
Edison, Thomas A. (Thomas Alva), 1847-1931 -- Juvenile literature
He was absent about two months, coming home rested and refreshed. Mr.
Edison says: "After my return from the trip to observe the eclipse
of the sun I went with Professor Barker, professor of physics in the
University of Pennsylvania, and Dr. Chandler, professor of chemistry
in Columbia College, to see Mr. Wallace, a large manufacturer of brass
in Ansonia, Connecticut. Wallace at this time was experimenting on
series arc lighting. Just at that time I wanted to take up something
new, and Professor Barker suggested that I go to work and see if I
could subdivide the electric light so it could be got in small units
like gas. This was not a new suggestion, because I had made a number of
experiments on electric lighting a year before this. They had been laid
aside for the phonograph. I determined to take up the search again and
continue it. On my return home I started my usual course of collecting
every kind of data about gas; bought all the transactions of the gas
engineering societies, etc., all the back volumes of gas journals, etc.
Having obtained all the data, and investigated gas-jet distribution in
New York by actual observations, I made up my mind that the problem
of the subdivision of the electric current could be solved and made
commercial."
The problem which Edison had undertaken to solve was a gigantic one.
The arc light was then known and in use to a very small extent, but the
subdivision of the electric light--as it was then called--had not been
accomplished. It had been the dream of scientists and inventors for a
long time.
Innumerable trials and experiments had been made in America and Europe
for many years, but without success. Although a great number of
ingenious lamps had been made by the foremost inventors of the period,
they were utterly useless as part of a scheme for a system of electric
lighting. In fact, these efforts had been so unsuccessful that many of
the leading scientists of the time, even as late as 1879, declared that
the subdivision of the light was an impossibility.
The chief trouble was that the early experimenters did not conceive the
idea of a _system_, and worked only on a lamp. They all seemed to have
the idea that an electric lamp was the main thing and that it should
be of low resistance and should be operated on a current of very low
voltage, or pressure. They, therefore experimented on lamps using short
carbon rods or strips for burners, which required a large quantity of
current.
Electric lighting with this kind of lamp was indeed a practical
impossibility. The quantity of current required for a large number of
them would have been prodigious, giving rise to tremendous problems on
account of the heating effects. Besides, the most fatal objection was
the cost of copper for conductors, which for a city section of about
half a mile square would have cost not less than a hundred million
dollars, on account of the enormous quantity of current that would be
required.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account