The Brass Check: A Study of American JournalismSinclair, Upton
General
The Brass Check: A Study of American Journalism
Sinclair, Upton
Associated Press; Journalism -- United States; Press -- United States
A few days later the “Post” endorsed me editorially as a candidate for
Governor, and there was a flurry in the corporation camp. The paper
was no more than on the streets before Mr. Field (telephone
magnate) ... made a frantic effort to have the edition stopped and the
paper’s support reconsidered. But the “Post” had just lost in a fight
with Evans (gas magnate) about a public franchise deal, and the
proprietors were eager for revenge. Their newspaper rivalry with
Senator Patterson made them ambitious to defeat him as leader of the
reform Democrats, by forcing my nomination in spite of him. I found
myself in the storm-centre of a small political cyclone.
You may recall Mr. Bonfils, one of the owners of the “Denver Post,” who
“jollied” me over the telephone during the time of the Colorado
coal-strike. Now hear Judge Lindsey:
When this latter ticket was named I found it largely composed of Speer
corporation Democrats. Mr. Fred G. Bonfils, one of the proprietors of
the “Denver Post” (which was still supporting me), assured me that
Speer and his city organization would aid me if I would agree to lend
my name to this ticket.
In short, the corporations being sure of Adams (the opposition
candidate), now wished to make sure of me by tying me to the candidacy
of a lot of corporation tools who would never allow us to obtain a
reform law. I refused to lend my name to any such business, and I lost
thereby the support of the “Post” and the Speer Democrats.
And then, of course, Judge Lindsey was marked for destruction by the
“Post.” He tells how a false news dispatch reported him as saying in a
public lecture in the East that the copper king of the state ought to be
hanged. The Denver Chamber of Commerce passed a resolution declaring
Lindsey “an enemy of the state.” Says Lindsey: “The ‘Denver Post’
followed the resolution with a demand that I be driven from town, and
stirred up all possible enmity against me as a ‘defamer’ of my state.”
Or take San Francisco. Here is Fremont Older, for twenty-five years
managing editor of the “Bulletin,” telling the story of his life. I
shall have more to say about Older later on; for the present, take one
incident from his book. Older, leading a terrific reform campaign, is
after the “man higher up,” and decides that the highest of all is
Herrin, head of the law department of the Southern Pacific Railroad.
“Herrin is the man behind the corruption of our whole state. Herrin is
the man who has broken down the morals of thousands of our young men,
debauched our cities and our towns and our villages, corrupted our
legislatures and courts.” But it appears that Crothers, owner of the
“Bulletin,” has been taking money from Herrin in times past.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account