American fiction -- 20th century; Chicago (Ill.) -- Fiction; Journalists -- Fiction; Marriage -- Fiction
The question of _how_ married, whether by the authority of the State of
Illinois, or by their own free will and consent, was not permitted to be
raised; for if once one started in considering questions like that, one
got nowhere! The _how_ of anything in the world was a question one might
debate for ever. Plato and H. G. Wells—St. Paul and Bernard Shaw—Tolstoi
and Nietzsche—Dante and Milton—and Edward Bok ... the sages had never
agreed what marriage was. Some said it was a social arrangement, some an
agreement between two individuals, some a mystical sacrament; others
considered it a necessary evil; and still others a damned nuisance.
Felix himself had inclined to the view that it was a relic of barbarism,
connected in some way with those other barbaric institutions, Private
Property and the State. Perhaps it was; but that was not the point.
Whether as a survival of the barbaric idea of possession or by common
understanding and consent, whether by the majestic force of law or by
private agreement, whether by sensual habitude or as an outward and
visible sign of some inward and spiritual grace—they were man and wife.
That seemed to simplify the situation immensely. The relations of two
individuals, as such, were infinitely complex and incalculable; but the
relations of man and wife were something that the mind could comprehend.
Thus—what had happened, as an incident in the history of two human
bundles of emotions and ideas, was a mystery profound and unfathomable;
but as an incident in the history of a marriage, it was no mystery at
all—it was just a quarrel.... Married people often quarreled. Why?
Perhaps because they were married.... And—generally—they made up.
Perhaps for the same reason.
It was a comfort to merge the uniqueness of one’s woes in the ocean of
generality—to feel that in this very perturbation he was representative
of a vast class; that even here he was simply a husband!
And the solution of his difficulties was—this being the conclusion to
which his theory led—to try to behave like any other husband in the same
circumstances. Not—he was quite certain of this—not like Felix Fay. Not
like a young man who has read learned books on psychology. But like a
husband....
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account