The bride's fate: The sequel to "The changed brides"Southworth, Emma Dorothy Eliza Nevitte
General
The bride's fate: The sequel to "The changed brides"
Southworth, Emma Dorothy Eliza Nevitte
American fiction -- 19th century
_If anything should happen to the child!_ Dangerous, speculation! In
monarchies it is treason even to _imagine_ the death of the sovereign.
And it is so with much good reason, since such imaginings often realize
themselves.
It could not be treason; but it was treachery in Clarence Everage even
to imagine the removal of the little child that stood between him and
the inheritance of Killcrichtoun. It was not only wrong but perilous for
him to do so. But it seemed as if he could not help it. Day and night he
brooded over the idea, with a morbid intensity akin to monomania. And
there was his poverty, and the pale faces of his poor wife and little
girls, to goad him on. And there was that painful computation of pounds,
shillings and pence, that agonized straining of his soul to make his
meagre wages meet their merest wants. And now the cruel extravagance
into which his pride and sensitiveness had betrayed him in paying for
that lunch at Véry’s had almost ruined him for this quarter. There was
now no possible way in which he could make the two ends meet for the
time.
And he knew, as only the experienced in such matters can know, and he
dreaded as only the proud and sensitive can dread, the troubles that
must follow—the degrading squabbles with his landlady, the humiliating
apologies to the butcher and the baker—nay, the sight of his wife’s
shabby dress and his little daughters’ all but bare feet.
And he thought how different all this would be were he the heir of
Killcrichtoun, as he should be but for Alexander Lyon’s son.
He thus “imagined” the death of the child and the advantages that must
accrue to himself in that event. But would he have “compassed” the death
of the child for any such advantage?
Oh, no! not for Killcrichtoun, or a hundred Killcrichtouns, would he
have committed such a crime. But—he was too prone to consider certain
facts in the statistics of population, life and death; how it was set
down that more than one half the children born, died before they had
attained the age of three years. He supposed little Lenny to be about
two years and a half old. He wondered whether the child had passed
safely through measles, whooping-cough, scarlet fever, and all the other
perilous “ills” to which children’s “flesh is heir,” or whether he had
yet to encounter all or any of them.
He had gathered from Lord Killcrichtoun’s narrative that the child lived
with his mother and her friends at the Morley House, and that he was
often taken by his nurse to walk in Trafalgar square and its vicinity.
And so, morning, noon, and evening, when not engaged in his school
duties or with his family, he prowled about the neighborhood, to waylay
little Lenny and his nurse, and watch over his health.
One day, when no one else was very near, he saw Pina and her charge
together, and accosted them.
“How do you do, my little man?” he inquired, patting Lenny on the head
or rather, the hat.
“Me not man—me itty boy,” answered Lenny, staring.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account