The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
The Spithead trouble, which was purely naval (the Nore Mutiny was
more or less political) arose entirely, so far as food was concerned,
out of the economists already referred to. Vast stores of provisions
had been accumulated, and many were going bad. Pursers received very
strict orders to use up the old “likely to decay soon” before touching
the new. The result was the issue of decayed pork, stinking cheese,
and mildewed biscuits to an unprecedented degree. A badness that had
hitherto been more or less occasional chanced just about the Mutiny
period to be general.
The men were by no means starved or badly fed, presuming the food to
be good. The usual scale was somewhat as follows:--A daily issue of a
pound of biscuit and a gallon of beer or else pint of wine; and when
these were exhausted, one gill of Navy rum diluted with three of water
twice a day. On Tuesdays and Saturdays an issue of 2lbs. of beef was
made; on Sundays and Thursdays 1lb. of pork. Over the week the issue
of other articles was 2lbs. pease, 1½lbs. oatmeal, 6ozs. of butter, an
equal amount of sugar, and 12ozs. of cheese and half-a-pint of vinegar
nominally per man; but actually every four men took the provisions
of six. Nine pounds of meat a week could hardly be called starvation
fare even to-day, and in those times it was an extraordinarily liberal
diet for men who at home would not have had anything like it.[72]
Except in cases with admirals like Collingwood (who in the matter of
understanding the ratio of health to efficiency was about the most
incompetent admiral the British Navy ever had), it was generally seen
to that, whenever possible, fresh provisions could be purchased from
traders who regularly visited blockading fleets.
Furthermore, rations were normally varied so far as circumstances would
permit, and when possible fresh beef and mutton were substituted for
the salt meat allowance. Nelson went to almost extravagant lengths
in these directions; but the majority of other officers were not far
behind. Whatever hell the Lower Deck of the Fleet entailed, the blame
in hardly any case lay with the officers, executive or otherwise, but
entirely with civilian officials and Members of Parliament with ideas
of their own about economy. All the reliable evidence is to the effect
that the responsible authorities desired their fighting men to live
(relatively speaking) like fighting cocks, that the difference between
the ideal and the real was due to civilian influence, and that even so
it was only really thoroughly bad just before the Great Mutiny. Had it
been a regular thing the Mutinies would probably never have happened,
the men would have been too used to the conditions to find in them a
special cause of complaint.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account