The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
“Such,” says the author of the biography, “were the reasons, no
doubt powerful enough, for hurrying off, even without pilots, the
ill-appointed and under-manned squadron placed under Sir Charles
Napier’s command, at this inclement season of the year, when the
periodical gales of the vernal equinox might be daily expected. The
squadron, on leaving Spithead, consisted of four sail-of-the-line,
four blockships, four frigates, and four steamers (not a single
gunboat); and with this force, hastily got together, for the most
part manned with the refuse of London and other towns, destitute of
even clothing, their best seamen consisting of dockyard riggers and
a few coastguard men--and without the latter, it has been alleged,
the squadron could not have put to sea--with this inefficient force
did Sir Charles Napier leave our shores, to offer battle to the
Russian Fleet, consisting of seven-and-twenty well-trained and
well-appointed ships of the line, eight or ten frigates, seven
corvettes and brigs, and nine steamers, besides small craft and
flotillas of gunboats, supposed in the aggregate to number one
hundred and eighty....
* * * * *
“It is, probably, an unprecedented event in the annals of war, or,
at least, in those of our history, that a fleet should be sent out,
on a most momentous service so ill-manned that the Commander was
directed to endeavour to ‘pick up,’ if possible, foreign seamen
in foreign ports, and so ill-provided with munitions of war, that
he was restricted in the use of what he most required, in order
to render his inexperienced crews as efficient as possible. It is
equally worthy of record that the Board of Admiralty, throughout
the whole campaign, never supplied the Fleet with a single Congreve
rocket, although it was no secret that great numbers had been
made in London for the Russians, to whom they were of far less
use than to the British Fleet, which could not well undertake any
bombardment without them. The Board of Admiralty must have been
perfectly aware of the conditions, in these respects, of that Fleet
on whose efficiency so much depended, and from which so much was
expected, for, in a letter to Sir Charles Napier, from a member of
that Board, I find it recorded as his opinion, that the Emperor of
Russia ought either to burn his Fleet, or try his strength with
the British Squadron whilst he mustered double their numbers, and
whilst our crews were ‘so miserably raw!’ Yet this inefficiency
was fully and frankly admitted by Sir James Graham, from whom
infrequent instructions arrived to supply the deficiency of good
men by picking up foreign sailors in the Baltic. The anxiety of
the First Lord upon this point was excessive. He was continually
inquiring whether the Admiral had been able to ‘_pick up any Swedes
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account