The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
“The determination of the French Government to build a number of
iron or steel-cased ships imperatively obliges us to follow their
example. The original idea of plating ships in this way, so as
to render them shot-proof, is due, not, as is generally supposed
in this country, to the present Emperor, but to a Captain in the
French Navy, who, about a quarter of a century since, suggested
that all wooden vessels should be sheathed with composite slabs of
iron of fourteen or fifteen centimetres in thickness; that is to
say, with stout plates of wrought-iron having blocks of cast metal
between. A similar suggestion was made among others by General
Paixhans; but one of the first to reduce it to practice was Mr.
Stevens, of New York, the well-known steamship builder, who about
ten years ago communicated to Mr. Scott Russell the results of a
long series of experiments, instituted by the American Government,
for the purpose of testing the power of plates of iron and steel
to resist cannon-shot. Mr. Lloyd, of the Admiralty, proposed the
adoption of plates 4ins. in thickness, instead of a number of
thinner sheets, as recommended by the Emperor. The English and
French floating batteries were, as is well known, protected upon
Mr. Lloyd’s plan. From trials recently made, however, it has been
pretty well ascertained that this iron planking, on whatever
principle applied, will only repel hollow shot or shells; heavy
solid projectiles of wrought iron, or those faced with steel,
having been found, on repeated trials, to perforate the thickest
covering which has ever been adopted, and that, too, even at
considerable ranges.
“Mr. Reed,[88] already alluded to, proposes to protect only the
midship portion of the ship, and to separate it from the parts fore
and aft by strong watertight compartments, so that, however much
the extremities might suffer, the ship would still be safe and
the crew below protected; but, as he himself admits, there would
obviously be no defence against raking shot.
“The French vessels last alluded to, follow the lines and
dimensions of the _Napoleon_ (one of the best, if not the
finest ship in their Navy); but they will only carry thirty or
thirty-six guns, and the metal sheathing will be from ten to eleven
centimetres (about 4¼ins.) in thickness. Two similar ships are to
be commenced here forthwith; and as the First Lord of the Admiralty
has prophetically warned us that they will be the most expensive
ships ever constructed in this country, it is earnestly to be hoped
that they may be found proportionately valuable, should their
powers ever come to be tested; they will each cost from £126,000
to £130,000, or £4,200 per gun; the ordinary expense of a sailing
man-of-war being about £1,000, and of a steamer from £1,800 to
£2,000 per gun.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account