The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
In the meantime the authorities were so pleased with the _Achilles_
that three improved editions of her were designed. They were not
completed until a new type of ship, which was completed before they
were, replaced them; but chronologically they followed close upon the
_Achilles_. They were laid down in 1861, and designed by Isaac Watts.
They were named _Agincourt_, _Minotaur_, and _Northumberland_. They
differed in minor details, but in substance were all about 1,000 tons
more than the _Achilles_, and their increased displacement mostly went
in one inch extra armour protection (5½-inch against 4½-inch).
As originally designed they were intended to mount seven 12-ton and
twenty 9-ton guns, but at a very early date the first two were given a
uniform armament of seventeen 12-ton. A small portion of this armament
of the upper deck was provided with armoured protection for right-ahead
fire.
[Illustration: THE _ACHILLES_ AS A FOUR-MASTER.
Photographed about 1866.]
In appearance they were magnificent ships, fitted with five masts.
Being 400 feet between perpendiculars they were the largest ships of
their time, and at sea always proved very steady under both sail and
steam.
These ships were the subject of violent disputes between the Controller
of the Navy and their constructor. The Controller insisted that they
were extravagantly large ships, as compared to French ships. The
constructor insisted that it was essential that for any given power and
protection a British ship must be larger than a foreign one, because of
her more extended probable duties, and the consequent necessity of a
larger coal supply.[93]
[Illustration: THE _MINOTAUR_, 1867, ORIGINAL RIG.]
At and about this period there were a number of wooden
ships-of-the-line building, which had been laid down from the year
1859 onwards. Following the French fashion, they were converted into
ironclads. These ships, displacing from 6,100 to 6,830 tons, were the
_Repulse_, _Royal Alfred_, _Zealous_ (laid down 1859), _Caledonia_,
_Ocean_, _Prince Consort_, _Royal Oak_ (1860).[94]
The upper-decks of these ships were removed, and they were fitted with
side armour, which was 4½ inches in the earliest to be treated, and 5½
inches in the latest. All of them carried sixteen 9-ton guns and four
6½-ton, with provision for ahead fire.
The experiment, though useful as a temporary expedient, was very
expensive, and several of the ships had to be lengthened before
anything could be done to them. None of them were very successful, and
most of them disappeared from the Navy List at an early date.
This ends the period of “broadside ironclads”; of the best of which it
may be said that they were nothing but efforts to adapt new ideals to
old methods.
XI.
THE REED ERA.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account