The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
“It may be proper in this connection to draw attention to the
fact that the probable employment of torpedoes in a future naval
war has not been lost sight of in carrying out these structural
improvements. Up to the present time torpedoes have been used
almost solely for coast and harbour defence, and have, under
those circumstances, proved most destructive, as a glance through
the reports of the operations of the Federal Fleet at Charleston
and other Confederate ports will show. It is still doubtful,
however, whether these formidable engines of war can be supplied
with anything like the same efficiency at sea under the vastly
different conditions which they will there have to encounter.
The Americans have, it is true, proposed to fit torpedo-booms to
their unarmoured ocean-cruisers, such as the _Wampanoag_, and
a naval war would doubtless at once bring similar schemes into
prominence. Nothing less than actual warfare can be expected to
set the question at rest; but whatever the result of such a test
may be, it is obviously a proper policy of construction to provide
as much as possible against the dangers of torpedoes; and it must
be freely admitted that the strongest ironclad yet designed,
although practically impenetrable by the heaviest guns yet
constructed, would be very liable to damage from the explosion of
a submerged torpedo. No ship’s bottom can, in fact, be made strong
enough to resist the shock of such an explosion; and the question
consequently arises: How best can the structure be made to give
safety against a mode of attack which cannot fail to cause a more
or less extensive fracture of the ship’s bottom, even if it does no
more serious damage? In our recent ships, as I have said, attempts
have been made to give a practical answer to this question.
Seeing that the bottom must inevitably be broken through by the
explosion of a torpedo which exerts its full force upon the ship,
it obviously becomes necessary to provide, as far as possible,
against the danger resulting from a great in-flow of water. This
is the leading idea which has been kept in view in arranging the
structural details of our ships to meet this danger, and the reader
cannot fail to perceive that the double bottom and watertight
subdivisions described above are as available against injury from
torpedoes as they are against the injuries resulting from striking
the ground.”
[Illustration: THE _BELLEROPHON_, COMPLETED 1866.]
Details of the _Bellerophon_ were as follows:--
Displacement--7,550 tons.
Length--300 ft. between perpendiculars.
Beam--56ft. 1in.
H.P.--6,520.
Mean Draught--26ft. 7ins.
Guns--Ten 12-ton M.L.R., five 6½-ton M.L.R. (changed in 1890 to ten
8-in. 14-ton B.L.R., four 6-in., six 4-in. ditto.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account