The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
“The most cursory consideration of the subject will, I think,
result in the feeling that the middle of the upper deck of a
full-rigged ship is not a very eligible position for fighting
large guns. Anyone who has stood upon the deck of a frigate,
amid the maze of ropes of all kinds and sizes that surrounds
him, must feel that to bring even guns of moderate size away
from the port holes, to place them in the midst of these ropes,
and discharge them there, is utterly out of the question; and
the impracticability of that mode of proceeding must increase in
proportion as the size and power of the guns are increased. But
as a central position, or a nearly central position, is requisite
for the turret, this difficulty has had to be met by many devices,
some of them tending to reduce the number of the ropes, and others
to get them stopped short above the guns. In the former category
come tripod masts; in the latter, flying-decks over the turrets;
the former have proved successful in getting rid of shrouds, but
they interfere seriously with the fire of the turret guns, and are
exposed to the danger of being shot away by them in the smoke of
action; the latter are under trial, but however successful they
may prove in some respects, they will be very inferior in point of
comfort and convenience to the upper decks of broadside frigates.
In the case of the _Monarch_, which has a lofty upper deck, neither
a tripod system nor a flying deck for working the ropes upon has
been adopted. A light flying deck to receive a portion of the
boats, and to afford a passage for the officers above the turrets,
has been fitted; but the ropes will be worked upon the upper deck
over which the turrets have to fire, and consequently a thousand
contrivances have had to be made for keeping both the standing
and running rigging tolerably clear of the guns. It seems to me
out of the question to suppose that such an arrangement can ever
become general in the British Navy, especially when one contrasts
the _Monarch_ with the _Hercules_ as a rigged man-of-war. Nor is
the matter at all improved, in my opinion, in the case of the
_Captain_ and other rigged turret-ships in which the ropes have to
be worked upon bridges or flying-decks poised in the air above the
turrets. Such bridges or decks, even if they withstand for long the
repeated fire of the ship’s own guns, must of necessity be mounted
upon a few supports only; and I am apprehensive that in action an
enemy’s fire would bring down parts, at least, of these cumbrous
structures, with their bitts, blocks, ropes, and the thousand and
one other fittings with which a rigged ship’s deck is encumbered,
with what result I need not predict.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account