The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
Captain Coles objected to the _Monarch_ altogether. He insisted with
vehemence that she did not in the least express his ideas. She had a
high forecastle, also a poop; these features depriving her of end-on
fire, except in so far as a couple of 6½-ton guns in an armoured
forecastle supplied the deficiency. The Admiralty replied that a
forecastle was essential for sea-worthiness; but Coles was so insistent
that eventually he was allowed to design a sea-going turret-ship on
his own ideas, in conjunction with Messrs. Laird, of Birkenhead,
who had already had considerable experience in producing masted
turret-ships.[98] Coles was given a free hand. As a naval officer his
form of turret displays the practical mind; as a ship designer he was
simply the raw amateur. The _Captain_, which he produced, accentuated
every fault of the _Monarch_, except in the purely technical matter
of rigging being in the way of the guns. Coles got over this by
fitting tripod masts (which Laird’s had evolved before him[99]); but
for the light flying bridges of the _Monarch_ he substituted a very
considerable superstructure erection. For the _Monarch’s_ armoured
two-gun forecastle, which he had so violently condemned, he substituted
a much larger unarmoured, one-gun structure. Owing to an error in
design, his intended 8-ft. freeboard was actually only 6ft., and his
ideal ship resulted in nothing but a _Monarch_ of less gun power, and
of 8ft. less freeboard. Her fate is dealt with later. Details of the
two ships are:--
================+===========================+=========================
| _Captain._ | _Monarch._
----------------+---------------------------+-------------------------
Displacement | 6900 tons. | 8320 tons.
Length (_p.p._) | 320 feet. | 330 feet.
Beam | 53 feet. | 57½ feet.
Draught | 25ft. 9½in. (_mean_). | 26ft. 7in. (_max._)
Guns | Four 25 ton M.L.R., | Four 25 ton M.L.R.,
| two 6½ ton, do. | three 6½ ton, do.[100]
Coal | 500 tons.[101] | 630 tons.
Speed | 14.25 kts. (twin screws). | 14.94 (single screw).
Waterline Belt | 8.6 inches. | 7.6 inches.
Turrets | 13.8 inches. | 10.8 inches.
Completed | 1869. | 1869.
================+===========================+=========================
It has been said that Captain Coles was tied down by Admiralty ideas
that a sea-going ship must have auxiliary sail power. All the
evidence is, however, to the effect that not only did he recognise
this limitation from the first, but that he concurred with it and
believed his design to fill the conditions best. It failed to do so,
the _Monarch_ under all conditions doing far better than the _Captain_
on trial (except occasionally under sail).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account