The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
“The court having heard the evidence which had been adduced in this
inquiry and trial, is of opinion that the loss of Her Majesty’s
ship _Vanguard_ was occasioned by Her Majesty’s ship _Iron Duke_
coming into collision with her off the Kisbank, the Irish Channel,
at about 12-50 on the 1st September, from the effects of which
she foundered; that such collision was caused--First, by the high
rate of speed at which the squadron, of which these vessels formed
a part, was proceeding whilst in a fog; secondly, by Captain
Dawkins, when leader of his division, leaving the deck of the ship
before the evolution which was being performed was completed, as
there were indications of foggy weather at the time; thirdly, by
the unnecessary reduction of speed of H.M.S. _Vanguard_ without
a signal from the vice-admiral in command of the squadron, and
without H.M.S. _Vanguard_ making the proper signals to the _Iron
Duke_; fourthly, by the increase of speed of H.M.S. _Iron Duke_
during a dense fog, the speed being already high; fifthly, by
H.M.S. _Iron Duke_ improperly shearing out of the line; sixthly,
for want of any fog signals on the part of H.M.S. _Iron Duke_.
“The court is further of opinion that the cause of the loss of
H.M.S. _Vanguard_ by foundering was a breach being made in her
side by the prow of H.M.S. _Iron Duke_ in the neighbourhood of
the most important transverse bulkhead--namely, that between the
engine and boiler rooms, causing a great rush of water into the
engine-room, shaft-alley, and stoke-hole, extinguishing the fires
in a few minutes, the water eventually finding its way into the
provision room flat, and provision rooms through imperfectly
fastened watertight doors, and owing to leakage of 99 bulkhead.
The court is of opinion that the foundering of H.M.S. _Vanguard_
might have been delayed, if not averted, by Captain Dawkins giving
instructions for immediate action being taken to get all available
pumps worked, instead of employing his crew in hoisting out boats,
and if Captain Dawkins, Commander Tandy, Navigating-Lieutenant
Thomas, and Mr. David Tiddy, carpenter, had shown more resource
and energy in endeavouring to stop the breach from the outside by
means at their command, such as hammocks and sails--and the court
is of opinion that Captain Dawkins should have ordered Captain
Hickley, of H.M.S. _Iron Duke_, to tow H.M.S. _Vanguard_ into
shallow water. The court is of opinion that blame is imputable to
Captain Dawkins for exhibiting want of judgment and for neglect of
duty in handling his ship, and that he showed a want of resource,
promptitude, and decision in the means be adopted for saving
H.M.S. _Vanguard_ after the collision. The court is further of
opinion that blame is imputable to Navigating-Lieutenant Thomas for
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account