The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
The actual successor of the _Hercules_, in the matter of first-class
ships, was the _Sultan_. She differed from the _Hercules_ merely in a
somewhat increased draught and displacement, and increased provision
for end-on bow fire--four 12½-ton guns able to fire ahead being
substituted for the one smaller gun in the _Hercules_.
This end-on fire was given because ram-tactics were then coming greatly
into favour. Particulars of the _Sultan_,[106] which was the last of
the central battery ironclads to be designed and built by Sir E. J.
Reed, are as follows:--
Displacement--9,290 tons.
Length--325ft.
Beam--59ft. ½-in.
H.P.--7,720.
Mean Draught--26ft. 5ins.
Guns--Eight 18-ton M.L.R., four 12½-ton M.L.R.
Coal--810 tons.
Armour (iron)--9ins., 8ins., and 6ins.
Speed--14.13 knots (single screw).
Builder of Ship--Chatham.
Builder of Machinery--Penn.
Cost--Hull and machinery, £357,415.
Launched--1870; completed for sea in 1871.
[Illustration:
CERBERUS.
DEVASTATION.
FURY.
DREADNOUGHT.
BREASTWORK MONITORS.]
Sir E. J. Reed’s “breastwork monitors” have already been referred to.
They were received with little enthusiasm by the Admiralty, and the
first of them were merely Colonial coast defence vessels. These were:--
============+==========+======+=======+=======+==========
Name. |Displ’m’t.|Speed.|Armour.|Turret |Completed.
| Tons. |Knots.|Inches.|Armour.|
------------+----------+------+-------+-------+----------
_Cerberus_ | 3480 | 9.75 | 8 | 10 | 1870
_Abyssinia_ | 2900 | 9.59 | 7 | 10 | 1870
_Magdala_ | 3340 |10.67 | 8 | 10 | 1870
============+==========+======+=======+=======+==========
In general design all were identical, a redoubt amidships carrying
two centre line turrets and a small oval superstructure between. Twin
screws were employed.
The belief in the ram already alluded to had by now attained such
proportions that a ship specially designed for ramming was called for,
and the _Hotspur_ was the result. Nothing written by Sir E. J. Reed
(and he wrote a great deal) indicates that he was in sympathy with
her design, though nominally responsible. The _Hotspur_ was not even
a turret-ship. She carried a fixed armoured structure of considerable
size,[107] inside of which a single 25-ton gun revolved, firing through
the most convenient of several ports. She was fitted with two masts
with fore and aft sails. Particulars of her were:--
Displacement--4,010 tons.
Length--235ft.
Beam--50ft.
H.P.--3,060.
Mean Draught--21ft. 10ins.
Guns--One 25-ton M.L.R., two 6½-ton.
Belt Armour--11in. to 8in.; complete belt.
Turret Armour--10in.
Coal--300 tons.
Speed--12.8 knots (twin-screw).
Builder--Napier, Glasgow.
Launched--1870; completed, 1871.
Cost--Hull and machinery, £171,528.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account