The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
Although tactics, as we understand them, cannot be said to have been
employed, certain definite war lessons were undoubtedly learned. It
came to be thoroughly believed that the principal use of a fleet was to
attack the fleet of the enemy; and on that account these wars are an
important feature of English naval history.
Following the conclusion of peace, the English Navy was entirely
neglected, and the condition of the ships became so bad that in 1679 a
Commission was appointed and thirty new ships were laid down. But the
majority of these ships, having been launched, were allowed to decay;
Charles II’s early interest in the fleet having become a dead letter in
his later years.
When James II came to the throne in 1685, he appointed another Special
Commission, and the repair of the Navy was systematically undertaken.
The _personnel_, however, was neglected. It remained in a very
dissatisfied state, and tacitly agreed to his deposition.
At the abdication of James II, in December, 1688, the Navy consisted
of 173 ships, manned by 42,003 men, and carrying 6,930 guns. Of these
ships, nine were first-rate, 11 second, 39 third, 41 fourth, 3 fifth,
and 6 sixth. There were 26 fire-ships and 39 small craft. The best of
the first-rates in those days was the _Britannia_. She was of 1,739
tons, carried 100 guns and a crew of 780 men. Her length was 146 feet,
her beam 47 feet 4 inches, and her draught 20 feet. The second-rate
ships were 90 gun-vessels, third-rate 70 guns, and fourth-rate 54.
During James II’s reign, bomb vessels were first introduced and regular
establishments of stores were instituted. It is somewhat difficult to
assess how far naval progress was actually indebted to this, the first
King of England who was a naval officer, and how far to the efforts
of a determined few who realised the absolute importance of naval
power. Probably of James I, as of all the Stuarts,[17] it may be said
that they realised the principle, but required pressing to act upon
it. To thus acting may be traced the unpopularity of at least some of
the Stuarts--there are practically no signs that the nation generally
understood the importance of a powerful Navy. All the indications are
in a contrary direction.
V.
THE EARLY FRENCH WARS.
The accession of William of Orange and the French support of James
soon brought about a war. Early in 1689 James invaded Ireland with
French ships and men. He did sufficiently well there for a considerable
English army to be employed against him, and in the summer of 1690,
William himself went over to take command, leaving Queen Mary as Regent
with little save the militia as military defence and a more or less
unprepared fleet.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account