The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
Reinforced by ten sail of the line, under Troubridge, Nelson now
sailed in search of the French fleet. Reaching Alexandria and finding
nothing known there of the French, he worked back to Syracuse, where
he revictualled in cheerful disregard of the neutrality remonstrances
of the Governor. Thence he returned eastward, and having received
information of where the French had last been seen, eventually found
them anchored in Aboukir Bay, where he attacked them on the evening of
August 1st, 1798.
The rival fleets were:--
BRITISH. FRENCH.
13 of 74 guns. 1 of 120 guns.
1 of 50 guns. 9 of 74 guns.
-- --
14 10, also 4 Frigates.
-- --
The French, under Brueys, were drawn across the Bay in a “defensive
position.” They were in no way a very efficient force, some of the
ships being old and short of guns, all of them rather short-handed, and
even so, manned with many new-raised raw men. On the other hand, they
were so sure of the safety of their position that their inshore guns
were not cleared for action. By all the naval theory of the day this
idea of impregnability was justified.
The battle itself was simple enough. Nelson came down with the wind on
the French van, approximately putting two of his ships one on either
side of each of the Frenchmen, and so on, the rear being unable to beat
up to support them. The result was the practical annihilation of the
French fleet. Of the thirteen ships of the line, only two escaped in
company with two frigates.
So complete a naval victory had never before been known. In all the
battles of the previous two or three hundred years, the percentage
of losses to the vanquished had been small. The battle of the Nile,
therefore, received an attention perhaps beyond its intrinsic worth. As
Nelson wrote to Howe:--“By attacking the enemy’s van and centre, the
wind blowing directly along their line, I was enabled to throw what
force I pleased on a few ships.” The real point of interest is not the
result, which was foregone, but Nelson’s ability to see his opportunity
and to make the utmost of it. Therein lay his superlative greatness.
Of the prizes, three were found to be new and good ships. One of them,
the _Franklin_, was renamed _Canopus_, and as late as 1850 was still on
the effective list of the British Navy.
The defeat of the French at the Nile had far reaching effects.
Russia, Austria, Turkey, Naples and Portugal formed with England a
great anti-French Alliance. A large Russian fleet appeared in the
Mediterranean, but accomplished no services there. It was under
suspicion of having private designs on Malta rather than of assisting
the Alliance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account