The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
Nelson, meanwhile, touched Gibraltar,[60] then proceeded north to join
Cornwallis off Brest, and thence to England in his flagship _Victory_.
Villeneuve, having picked up a few more ships at Ferrol, making
his total force twenty-nine sail, put into Cadiz,[61] off which
Collingwood maintained a weary blockade of him.
[Illustration: BATTLE OF TRAFALGAR. 1805.]
Early in September, news reached England that Villeneuve was at Cadiz,
and Nelson left Southsea Beach on September 14th, sailing next day.
Collingwood, off Cadiz, had been reinforced up to twenty-four sail.
A martinet officer of the old type, it is likely enough that had
Villeneuve come out, he might have done something against the worn-out
blockaders. The arrival of Nelson, on September 28th, changed all this.
Collingwood’s red tape restrictions were countermanded, and the spirit
of the entire fleet changed accordingly. As usual, Nelson spared no
effort to keep the men fit and healthy.
On the 19th October, Villeneuve came out--driven thereto by threats
from Napoleon. As Napoleon had broken up his Boulogne camp on August
26th and by now had the greater part of that army in Germany, his
forcing Villeneuve to sea is one of those mysteries which can never be
fathomed. He acted in the teeth of naval advice, and there are few more
pathetic pictures in history than the disgraced Villeneuve putting to
sea to known certain defeat, endeavouring to fire his men with hope.[62]
On the 20th October, the Franco-Spanish fleet was at sea with
thirty-three ships of the line, the British consisting of twenty-seven.
Nelson let the enemy get clear of the land, and then on October 21st,
attacked them off Trafalgar.
Of this battle so much has been written that any detailed description
here is superfluous. To this day, the historians dispute as to what
the exact tactics were, and it is doubtful whether anything will ever
get beyond Professor Laughton’s summary in his _Nelson_. Here the most
emphasis is laid on the fact that in his memorandum of October 9th,
Nelson expected to handle forty ships against a still larger hostile
force. All these matters are, however, but for the academicians. The
main facts are that Nelson correctly gauged the inability and gunnery
inefficiency of the enemy and sailed down on them in two lines ahead,
they lying in line abreast--a position which, had they been able to
shoot well, promised them victory better than any other.
As an exhibition of tactics, Trafalgar was not even original--Rodney
in the past had done something very similar. On no principle of
“theory” was Nelson right. Simply and solely his genius lay in ability
to calculate the human element, to lay his plans accordingly, and to
achieve certain victory on that!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account