The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
_Rattlesnake_ Ratto
_Repulse_ Beecham
_Resolution_ Reso
_Royal Sovereign_ Royal Quid
_Salamander_ Sally and her Ma
_Sanspareil_ San Pan
_Scylla_ Silly
_Seagull_ Gull
_Sheldrake_ Shell Out
_St. Vincent_ Saint
_Sutlej_ Suble J.
_Tartar_ Emetic
_Téméraire_ Temmy
_Terrible_ Orrible
_Undaunted_ Dauntless
_Yarmouth_ Lunatic
_Warspite_ War Spider
_Note._--From time to time Nicknames vary, as occasionally they are
bestowed by other ships. This list is not quite complete on that
account.
FOOTNOTES
[1] Most of the criticism past and present of the Barnaby era is
rendered worthless by an ignoring of this report.
[2] This is instanced by the increasing ahead fire given to the
broadside ironclads.
[3] _Our Ironclad Ships._
[4] In this connection see _Imperieuse_ and _Warspite_ later on.
[5] _Naval Developments of the Century_, by Sir N. Barnaby, pp. 163–164.
[6] Re-designed to give extra protection.
[7] _See_ Reed Era.
[8] In the Chili-Peruvian War--as late as 1879–81--a torpedo fired from
the _Huascar_ did this.
[9] The full report is to be found in Part IV of _Brassey’s Naval
Annual_, 1888–9.
[10] It is worthy of note that these ships were abnormally
“over-gunned” according to the ideas which were then in official
favour, and which, later on, came more into favour still. The same
applies to the _Arethusa_ class.
[11] It is interesting to note that the Laird firm, who built the
_Rattlesnake_, which was easily the fastest of her class, made her
engines considerably heavier than Admiralty specifications. For this
they were fined £1,000, which sum, however, was remitted after the
brilliant success of the ship in the manœuvres above referred to.
[12] Mr. W. T. Stead, who edited the _Pall Matt Gazette_ at that time,
intimated some twenty years later that Lord Fisher was behind him in
commencing the agitation. Lord Charles Beresford, then in political
life, brought the Bill forward.
[13] In 1899 the _Blake_ was re-boilered. The ships remained upon the
effective list till 1906, when they were converted into sea-going depot
ships for destroyers, most of their guns being removed. They now carry
each 670 tons of coal of their own, and 470 tons stowed in one cwt.
bags for use by destroyers.
[14] This ship very greatly exceeded her nominal displacement of 14,200
tons. She was actually 15,400 tons. The essentially White ships were,
on the other hand, of about their nominal displacement. Of the _Hood_
it may further be added that she was greatly inferior to the others as
a sea-boat--a serious set-off against her superior big gun protection.
[15] 4 _Astræas_ = 8--6in., 16--4.7. 5 _Apollos_ = 10--6in., 15--4.7
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account