The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
The former ship was laid down at Pembroke and engined by Hawthorn; the
latter was built and engined by the Thames Iron Works. In the matter
of armament and its arrangement the ships were to some extent cruiser
versions of the _King Edward_; but equally, in the adoption of a number
of single gun-houses for big guns, and the jump from two to a larger
number of big guns, the influence of the Chilian _O’Higgins_, built
at Elswick, may be noticed. The big guns were placed one forward and
one aft, two on either beam and two on either quarter. The 6-inch
were placed in an armoured battery below. As originally designed,
right ahead fire was given to the forward battery guns, but this was
dispensed with at a later date. The ships were never good sea boats,
and the 6-inch guns were soon found to be well-nigh useless in any sea.
The armour was disposed in generous fashion--a complete belt reaching
up to the main deck, 4in. forward, 6in. for some 260ft. amidships, and
3in. aft of that. A 6in. battery (K.N.C.) with bulkheads surmounts the
belt-7in. barbettes with 6in. K.C. flat-sided gunhouses.
Both were given a mixed installation of Babcock and cylindrical
boilers. A novelty was the standardisation of all their machinery, a
very valuable innovation, which has been followed ever since. Parts of
any one ship’s machinery can be used for any other of her class, thus
facilitating rapid repairs and requiring a considerably reduced stock
of spares.
On trials the _Duke of Edinburgh_ did on her eight hours’ full power
trial I.H.P. 23,685 = 22.84 knots, the _Black Prince_ 23,939 = 23.6
knots. In service, however, the former has generally proved the better
steamer. Another innovation in these ships was the re-appearance of
the stern torpedo tube, first introduced in the _Centurions_. As
re-introduced it was built submerged, a feature long desired, but which
had previously presented innumerable difficulties in design.
[Illustration:
SWIFTSURE.
WATTS ERA.
LORD NELSON.
BLACK PRINCE.
WARRIOR.
MINOTAUR.
PRE-DREADNOUGHTS OF THE WATTS ERA.]
For the Estimates of the following year (1903–04) four more ships of
the same type were provided--
===========+============+===========+=============
Name. | Laid down. | Builders. | Engines by.
-----------+------------+-----------+-------------
_Achilles_ | Feb. ’04 | Elswick | Hawthorn
_Cochrane_ | Mar. ’04 | Fairfield | Fairfield
_Warrior_ | Jan. ’04 | Vickers | Vickers
_Natal_ | Nov. ’03 | Pembroke | Wallsend Co.
===========+============+===========+=============
In these the defect of the low 6-in. battery of the _Black Princes_ was
anticipated, and instead of ten 6-inch guns, four 7.5 were mounted in
gun-houses on the upper deck amidships. Yarrow and cylindrical boilers
mixed were installed. Otherwise no change was made. On trial the
_Achilles_ reached a maximum of 23.27, the other three ships all made
their contracts or over.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account