The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
The ships removed included all battleships and armoured cruisers of
earlier date than the _Trafalgar_, several ships of the _Apollo_ class,
all earlier protected cruisers, some of the “P” class, and the bulk of
the small fry in the way of sloops and gunboats.
This action aroused a certain amount of criticism on the grounds that
the clearance was excessive. As some of the ships were subsequently
restored to the active list, something is undoubtedly to be said for
that point of view; especially as no steps were taken to replace the
scrapped cruisers. On the other hand, most of the ships removed were
of trivial fighting value; though here again the zeal of the reformer
somewhat overlooked the fact that the police duties rendered by the
small fry had been valuable.
In connection with this policy some of the outlying naval bases were
done away with, and there commenced a “reorganisation” of the Fleet
which has continued intermittently from that day to this! Certain other
considerable changes affecting the _personnel_ will be found dealt with
in a later chapter.
IV.
THE DREADNOUGHT ERA--(WATTS).
A new era in battleship design, not only for the British Navy, but
for the navies of the entire world, was opened with the advent of the
_Dreadnought_. As has been seen, it was in a way led up to by previous
designs, notably the _Lord Nelson_ class. The essential point of
difference, however, lies in the fact that whereas the _Lord Nelson_
carries heavy guns of two calibres, in the _Dreadnought_ the main
armament is confined to one calibre only. The advantages of this on
paper are not particularly great, but for practical purposes, such
as fire control and so forth, the superiority to be obtained by a
uniformity of big gun armament is tremendous.
As the historical portion of this book indicates, the “Dreadnought
idea” has been a fairly regular feature of British Naval Policy, but
in this particular case the inception would seem to have been due to
accident and circumstance rather than to any settled policy.
Immature and abortive attempts to realise something of the “Dreadnought
ideal” had taken place in the past. The earliest ship claimed to
represent the Dreadnought ideal was the U.S. _Roanoake_, built at
the time of the Civil War. This was a high freeboard ship, fitted
with three turrets in the centre line. A few years later something
of the same sort found expression in the four-turreted British
_Royal Sovereign_ and _Prince Albert_, though these were merely coast
defence ships. Still later in the _Tchesma_ class, Russian, and in the
_Brandenburg_ class of the German Navy, six big guns were installed
as the primary armament. Both these two ideas were laughed out of
existence; and it became a settled fashion to carry four big guns, two
forward and two aft.
[Illustration: GENERAL CUNIBERTI.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account