The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
It is interesting to note that Italy, which in the seventies evolved in
the _Duilio_ and _Dandolo_ the “Dreadnought” of that period, eventually
developed a very similar idea in the _Italia_ and _Lepanto_, which had
no side armour whatever. In later designs a thin belt was reverted to,
and finally the old cycle was resumed.
This result was brought about by the quickfirer, which appeared as a
rival to the hitherto predominant monster gun. To-day the torpedo is
becoming paramount and a danger to a fleet in close order at almost any
range--hence the Bacon ideal. It remains to be seen whether the future
will produce any analogy to the cycle of the quickfirer of the eighties.
Details of the _Invincible_ type are:--
Displacement--17,250 tons.
Length (over all)--562ft. (_p.p._, 530ft.).
Beam--78½ft.
Draught--29ft.
Armament--Eight 12-inch, XI, 45 calibre, sixteen 4-inch (model
1907); three submerged tubes.
Armour Belt--7-inch, reduced to 4-inch at the ends.
Machinery--Parsons Turbine.
Horse-power--41,000 = 25 knots.
Boilers--(_Invincible_ and _Inflexible_) Yarrow, (_Indomitable_)
Babcock.
Coal--(normal) 1,000 tons; (maximum) 3,000 tons; oil fuel also.
Builders--(_Invincible_) Elswick, (_Inflexible_) Clydebank,
(_Indomitable_) Fairfield.
Engined--(_Invincible_) Humphrys, (_Inflexible_) Clydebank,
(_Indomitable_) Fairfield.
As originally designed, the anti-torpedo guns of these ships would
have been the same as the _Dreadnought’s_, but, having been completed
nearly two years later and a new pattern 4-inch quickfirer having been
invented in the interim, they were fitted with these guns. The trial
results were as follows:--_Invincible_, 26.6 knots; _Inflexible_, 26.5
knots; and _Indomitable_, 26.1 knots; the designed horse power being
considerably exceeded in every case. After they were commissioned and
had shaken down, these trial speeds were considerably exceeded, and at
one time and another they all did well over 28 knots; the _Indomitable_
having made a record of 28.7.
The fuel consumption of these ships is naturally enormous. The
_Indomitable_, in crossing the Atlantic at full speed, burned about
500 tons of coal a day, as well as about 120 tons of oil. As steamers
they are to be considered remarkably successful. The average cost of
construction was about £1,752,000, which works out at a little under
£102 per ton.
Towards the close of the year 1911 the official designation of
“armoured cruiser” for them and similar ships was abandoned, and the
term “battle cruiser” substituted. No further secret was made of the
fairly obvious fact that they were designed as “fast battleships,”
intended to engage and hold a retreating enemy till such time as the
main squadron could come up.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account