The British State Telegraphs: A Study of the Problem of a Large Body of Civil Servants in a DemocracyMeyer, Hugo Richard
History
The British State Telegraphs: A Study of the Problem of a Large Body of Civil Servants in a Democracy
Meyer, Hugo Richard
Government ownership; Telegraph -- Great Britain
The Post Office employees demand "a new judgment on the
old facts." Mr. S. Woods' Motion, in February, 1898. Mr.
Steadman's Motions in February and June, 1899. Mr. Hanbury,
Financial Secretary to the Treasury, points out that the
postal employees are demanding a House of Commons Select
Committee because under such a Committee "the agitation and
pressure, now distributed over the whole House, would be
focussed and concentrated upon the unfortunate members of the
Select Committee." Mr. Steadman's Motion, in April, 1900. Mr.
Bayley's Motion, in June, 1901. Mr. Balfour, Prime Minister,
confesses that the debate has filled him "with considerable
anxiety as to the future of the public service if pressure
of the kind which has been put upon the Government to-night
is persisted in by the House." Captain Norton's Motion, in
April, 1902. The Government compromises by appointing the
Bradford Committee of business men. Mr. Austen Chamberlain,
Postmaster General, states that members from both sides of the
House "seek from him, in his position as Postmaster General,
protection for them in the discharge of their public duties
against the pressure sought to be put upon them by employees
of the Post Office." He adds: "Even if the machinery by
which our Select Committees are appointed were such as would
enable us to secure a Select Committee composed of thoroughly
impartial men who had committed themselves by no expression of
opinion, I still think that it would not be fair to pick out
fifteen members of this House and make them marked men for the
purpose of such pressure as is now distributed more or less
over the whole Assembly."
[Sidenote: _Civil Servants demand Right to agitate_]
On February 18, 1898, in the House of Commons, Mr. S. Woods[182] moved:
"And we humbly represent to Your Majesty that your servants in the
Post Office are not permitted to exercise the franchise, generally
allowed to other Departments in the State; nor to serve on electoral
committees; nor to take part in political agitation; and are otherwise
deprived of the privileges of citizenship in defiance of the letter
and spirit of the law; that the officials of the Post Office refuse to
recognize the Postmen's Trade Union; their officials are illegally and
unjustly dismissed for circularizing Parliamentary Candidates; and we
humbly beg Your Majesty to instruct the Postmaster General to remedy
these grievances."[183]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account