The Brontë Family, with special reference to Patrick Branwell Brontë. Vol. 2 of 2Leyland, Francis A.
History
The Brontë Family, with special reference to Patrick Branwell Brontë. Vol. 2 of 2
Leyland, Francis A.
Authors, English -- 19th century -- Biography; Brontë family; Brontë, Patrick Branwell, 1817-1848
The evidence for the original ascription of authorship is simple in
the extreme. Charlotte Brontë has told us in the Biographical Notice,
as well as in the Preface, which she has prefixed to 'Wuthering
Heights,' that the book was the work of Ellis Bell; and clearly no
shadow of doubt was on her mind at the time as to the accuracy of this
statement; nor had the publisher of the book any uncertainty as to the
matter. Moreover, the servant Martha is said to have seen Emily Brontë
writing it. We are told, also, that it is impossible that the upright
spirit of the gentle Emily could resort to the miserable fraud of
appropriating a work which was not her own. And, lastly, modern
critics have not found it difficult to believe that a woman might be
the author of 'Wuthering Heights.' They see nothing incongruous or
impossible in the possession, by a feminine intellect, of such a
searching knowledge of sinister propensities as are developed in that
book, nor of its descending to those chaotic depths of black moral
distortion, where it is possible for Hindley Earnshaw, with hideous
blasphemy, to drink damnation to his soul, that he may be able to
'punish its Maker,' and where the life-long vengeance of Heathcliff is
drawn out, with wondrous power, to its ghastly and impotent end.
How far Charlotte's statement is weakened by the fact that, up to the
time when she discovered the volume of verse, and the three sisters
commenced their novels--at which period it will be remembered one
volume of Branwell's work was written--they had made no communication
to one another of the literary work which each had in progress, is,
perhaps, a matter for personal opinion. The declaration of Martha
would probably be of little value, unless we knew that what Emily was
writing was entirely independent of Branwell's work. And, again, those
who have sought to defend Ellis Bell from the charge of fraud, have
perhaps been over hasty; for, so far as I know, that charge has never
been either made or implied.
As to the capability of Branwell to write 'Wuthering Heights,' not
much need be said here. Those who read this book will see that,
despite his weaknesses and his follies, Branwell was, indeed,
unfortunate in having to bear the penalty, in ceaseless open
discussion, of 'une fanfaronnade des vices qu'il n'avait pas,' and
that, moreover, his memory has been darkened, and his acts
misconstrued, by sundry writers, who have endeavoured to find in
his character the source of the darkest passages in the works of
his sisters.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account