The Brooklyn Medical Journal. Vol. II. No. 2. Aug., 1888Various
Science
The Brooklyn Medical Journal. Vol. II. No. 2. Aug., 1888
Various
Medicine -- Periodicals
It almost entirely prevents both peptic and pancreatic digestion of
albumen.
The bearing of these experiments upon the sanitary question of
permitting the use of these preservatives in foods, is self-evident.
Prof. Leffman says: “Their use is scarcely allowable under any
circumstances, and certainly only when the nature of the preservative
and the amount is distinctly stated.” The use of saccharine as a
sweetening agent must be looked upon as deleterious to health, and ought
to be forbidden by sanitary authorities.
MILK AND SCARLATINA.
In a recent number of the JOURNAL, we published an abstract of the
reported investigations of Mr. Power, Dr. Cameron and Dr. Klein of a
disease among cows, which they believed had caused scarlatina among
persons using the milk. The conclusions reached by these gentlemen
seemed so startling that the Agricultural Department of the Privy
Council began an investigation of the disease. The investigation was
given into the hands of Dr. Cruikshank, whose reports are published in
the _British Medical Journal_ of December 17, 1887, and January 21,
1888.
We have only space here to reproduce the conclusions reached by Dr.
Cruikshank, which are as follows:
1. The nature of the contagium of scarlet fever is unknown.
2. The micro-organism regarded by Dr. Klein as this contagium is the
_streptococcus pyogenes_.
3. _Streptococcus pyogenes_ is found sometimes in company with
_staphylococcus pyogenes aureus_, as a secondary result in scarlet fever
and many other diseases.
4. A streptococcus was first observed in scarlet fever by Crooke, later
by Löffler, Huebner and Bahrdt; but its exact relation to scarlatina,
and its undoubted identity with the streptococcus from pus and puerperal
fever, was definitely established in 1885 by Frankel and Freudenberg.
5. Both the Wiltshire and Hendon cow diseases were called cow-pox by the
people on the farms.
6. Both diseases correspond in their clinical history.
7. The ulcers on the teats correspond in naked eye and microscopical
appearances, and the latter vividly recall the appearances of cow-pox.
8. Calves inoculated from the discharges of the ulcers are similarly
affected.
9. _Post-mortem_ examination of such calves, or of calves inoculated
with streptococci isolated from scarlet fever cases, show similar
appearances.
10. The _post-mortem_ appearances in such inoculated calves are the
result of septicæmia.
11. There are no specific visceral changes in cow-pox, apart from
complications or coincident affections.
To the above criticism of Dr. Klein’s investigation of the Hendon cow
disease, this gentleman claims that Dr. Cruikshank studied a different
affection, and that the organisms were not the same. It is insisted upon
by Dr. Klein, that Dr. Cruikshank’s conclusions were the result of
studying cow-pox and not the peculiar disease he described as the Hendon
cow disease.
THE CAUSE OF DEATH IN PHTHISIS.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account