The Brooklyn Medical Journal. Vol. II. No. 2. Aug., 1888Various
Science
The Brooklyn Medical Journal. Vol. II. No. 2. Aug., 1888
Various
Medicine -- Periodicals
The sale of so-called patent medicines by pharmacists is a continual
irritant to doctors. Their objections have the same basis as in the
preceding case, namely, that apothecaries ought not to encourage the
people to prescribe for themselves. A distinguished physician once said
that drugs do more harm than good—a statement which will not be disputed
by those most conversant with the facts. But this is no argument against
the employment of medicinal remedies in any proper way. Drugs taken by
advice of educated, competent physicians do an immense amount of good;
the injury comes almost altogether from their administration
independently of the recommendation of qualified medical men. Concocted,
not to benefit humanity, but to enrich their manufacturers, advertised
as positive cures of diseases which the utmost skill of the medical
profession cannot control, sometimes inert, sometimes dangerous from the
poisons which they contain, pressed upon the attention of the people
with impudent persistence and colossal mendacity, the infamous
compounds, called patent medicines, are purchased by the credulous
public in almost incredible amounts. Nobody knows as well as the
pharmacist what quantities of drugs are sold in this form; nobody knows
as fully as the physician the enormously baneful effects which they
produce. If apothecaries would refuse to handle this class of goods,
they would confer a wonderful blessing on humanity, by demonstrating
their belief in the injuriousness of these articles, and thus bringing
them into disrepute; and they would vastly dignify their profession by
displaying its sense of moral obligation, even at the sacrifice of a
lucrative part of its business.
Apothecaries complain that, to meet the demands of prescriptions, they
are obliged, at great expense, to keep in stock a large number of
whimsical preparations, and also many brands of the same standard
medicines, when really one is practically as eligible as another. There
is force in this complaint. As a rule, the former class of preparations
has but an ephemeral popularity, and, as for the latter, there cannot
often be need of specifying the goods of a particular manufacturer; for
a worldly-wise, not to say honorable, pharmacist certainly may be
trusted to furnish only fine articles, that he may keep the favor of
those upon whose good-will his legitimate business depends. If a special
brand is deemed necessary by the doctor, he can request a convenient
apothecary to procure a quantity, and then can send to his shop the
patients who require this article. Thoughtful consideration of this
grievance will dictate some such course and effect its redress.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account