Slavery -- United States; United States -- Politics and government -- 1861-1865; United States -- Race relations
Only so much of his eloquence has survived as was indifferently
reported. The spirit of the graceful periods was lost. He was a
parenthetical speaker, which was a defect in a written oration, but it
did not, when uttered, impair the quality of his speeches, but rather
added a charm when accentuated by his voice and commended by his
gracious manner. At first his style was ornate, and poetry and fiction
were pressed from his crowded memory into service; but it was soon
changed into a plain and stronger cast of what he considered to be,
and doubtless was, the higher kind of oratory. His extempore addresses
are models of grace and ready command of language."[127]
He took his seat in the United States house of representatives in
December, 1845, he and Toombs, who was two years younger, beginning their
congressional careers together. Davis made a very creditable speech on the
Oregon question early in February, 1846. He was a modest member, but he
did all the duties of his place with praiseworthy diligence.
Although he was a thoroughgoing anti-tariff democrat and Webster a
pro-tariff whig leader, he could not be induced to join in the effort to
make political capital for his own party by blackening the name of
Webster. The minority report of the committee which investigated the
conduct of Webster, as secretary of state, was really made by Davis, who
was one of the committee. The stand taken by the latter, and the true
presentation which he made, at last got the whole committee to adopt his
report substantially. Webster was greatly pleased with it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account