Slavery -- United States; United States -- Politics and government -- 1861-1865; United States -- Race relations
And if one chose to look through the belonging parts of the Correspondence
and the other accessible pertinent records, he will find ample proofs that
he was ever alert to all the duties of his office, performing each one,
whether important or trivial, with the height of skill and diligence.
Consider, as to his career in the war department, this language of one of
the most inveterate of his disparagers:
"Many of his friends and admirers had with regret seen him abandon his
seat in the legislative hall for a place in the president's council.
They apprehended that he would, to a great extent, lose the renown
which he had gained as a member of congress, for they thought that the
didactic turn of his mind rendered him unfit to become a successful
administrator. He undeceived them in a manner which astonished even
those who had not shared these apprehensions. The department of war
was in a state of really astounding confusion when he assumed charge
of it. Into this chaos he soon brought order, and the whole service of
the department received an organization so simple and at the same time
so efficient that it has, in the main, been adhered to by all his
successors, and proved itself capable of standing even the test of the
civil war."[47]
Now let us glance at his magnificent success in winning for the United
States the vast territory of Texas and Oregon. The latter had long been in
dispute between us and England. Ever since 1818 it had been jointly
occupied under agreement. We wanted all of it; and of course as our
settlements in the west approached nearer and nearer, our desire for it
mounted. And England wanted all of it too. Soon after Texas achieved her
independence she applied for admission into our union, but as the settlers
had carried slavery with them free-soil opposition kept her out. Texas got
in debt, and the only thing for her to do was to tie to some great power
willing to receive her. England, seeing her opportunity, was trying to
propitiate Mexico in order, with the favor of the latter, to get Texas for
herself. Of course the south wanted Texas to come in, but the free-soilers
did not. And the north wanted Oregon; and although its soil and climate
did not admit of slavery, the south was against its acquisition unless the
concession be made that it be permitted to slavery to occupy all the
suitable soil of the Territories. As early as 1843 Calhoun, with his
piercing vision, saw the situation clearly. If the dispute as to Oregon
provoked war, England could throw troops thither from China by a much
shorter route than ours, the latter going as it did from the States on the
Atlantic coast around Cape Horn. That would be bad enough for us. But
suppose England gets Texas. A hostile power, with a vast empire of land,
will spring up under the very nose of the States, where our adversary will
acquire a base of operations in the highest degree unfavorable to us. Then
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account