The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 01 (of 10)Hickson, Sydney J. (Sydney John)
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 01 (of 10)
Hickson, Sydney J. (Sydney John)
Animals
CORTEX.—All the stages in the formation of a cortex are to be seen among
the adult members of the group. Certain species (e.g. _Plakina monolopha_,
F.E.S.) are destitute even of an ectosome, {211}others have a simple dermal
membrane (_Halichondria panicea_, _Tetilla pedifera_) and various others
are provided with a cortex, either of simple structure or showing
elaboration in one or more particulars. Thus a protective armature of
special spicules may be present in the cortex, _e.g._ in _Geodia_, or to a
less extent in _Tethya_, or there may be an abundance of contractile
elements, and these may be arranged in very definite ways, forming
valve-like apparatus that will respond to stimuli.
Everywhere among sponges the goal of the skeleton appears to have been
coherence. We have seen how in Calcarea and in Hexactinellida this has been
attained by the secretion around the separate elements of a continuous
mineral sheath, calcareous in the one case and siliceous in the other. Here
we had an excellent instance of the attainment of one end by similar means
in two different groups, after their separation from the common stock, and
therefore independently. In Demospongiae, on the other hand, the same
end—coherence—has been secured by two new methods, each distinct from the
former: first the spicules may be united in strands by an organic deposit,
spongin; secondly, the spicules may assume irregular shapes and interlock
closely with one another, forming dense and stout skeletons. The latter
method is that characteristic of the Lithistid Tetractinellida.
CLASSIFICATION.—It is not of great moment which scheme of classification we
maintain, seeing that all hitherto proposed are confessedly more or less
artificial, and sufficient data for framing a natural one are not yet
forthcoming. For convenience, we accept three subdivisions and define them
thus:—
I. TETRACTINELLIDA.—Demospongiae possessing tetraxon or triaene spicules
or Lithistid desmas.
II. MONAXONIDA.—Demospongiae possessing monaxon but not tetraxon
spicules.
III. CERATOSA.—Demospongiae in which the main skeleton is formed of
fibres of spongin. The fibres may have a core of sand-grains or of
foreign spicules, but not of spicules proper to the sponge.
But at the same time we admit that some of the Ceratosa are probably
descended from some of the families of Monaxonida, so that we should
perhaps be justified in separating these families of Monaxonida from the
rest, and associating them with the allied families of Ceratosa—a method of
classification due to {212}Vosmaer. Again, some Monaxonida approximate to
Tetractinellida, and we might, with Vosmaer, unite them under the title
Spiculispongiae. This proceeding, though it has the advantage of being at
least an attempt to secure a natural classification, involves too much
assumption when carried out in detail to be wholly satisfactory.
SUB-CLASS I. TETRACTINELLIDA.[239]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account