The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 01 (of 10)Hickson, Sydney J. (Sydney John)
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 01 (of 10)
Hickson, Sydney J. (Sydney John)
Animals
{229}[Illustration: FIG. 113.—_Lophocalyx philippensis._ The specimen bears
several buds attached to it by long tufts of spicules. (After F. E.
Schulze.)]
[Illustration: FIG. 114.—_Leucosolenia botryoides._ A, a piece of the
Sponge laden with buds, _a-f_; _i_, the spicules of the buds directed away
from their free ends; _k_, the spicules of the parent directed towards the
osculum, _j_. B, a bud which has been set free and has become fixed by the
extremity which was free or distal in A. (After Vasseur.)]
Such a reversal of the position of the bud is noteworthy in view of its
rarity, and the case is worth reinvestigating, for in other animal groups a
bud or a regenerated part retains so constantly the same orientation as the
parent that Loeb,[257] after experimenting on the {230}regeneration of
Coelenterata and other forms, concluded that a kind of "polarity" existed
in the tissues of certain animals.
In _Oscarella lobularis_[258] the buds are transparent floating bladders,
derived from little prominences on the surface of the sponge. Scattered in
the walls of the bladders are flagellated chambers, which open into the
central cavity. The vesicular nature of the buds is doubtless an
adaptation, lessening their specific gravity and so enabling them to float
to a distance from the parent.
GEMMULATION.—_Spongilla_ has already afforded us a typical example of this
process. Gemmules very similar to those of _Spongilla_ are known in a few
marine sponges, especially in _Suberites_ and in _Ficulina_. They form a
layer attached to the surface of support of the sponge—a layer which may be
single or double, or even three or four tiers deep. A micropyle is
sometimes present in the spongin coat, sometimes absent; possibly its
absence may be correlated with the piling of one layer of gemmules on
another, as this, by covering up the micropyle, would of course render it
useless. Presumably when a micropyle is present the living contents escape
through it and leave the sponge by way of the canal system (Fig. 115).
[Illustration: FIG. 115.—Gemmules of _Ficulina_. A, vertical section of
gemmules _in situ_; B, vertical section of upper portion of one gemmule.
_m_, Micropyle.]
The only case besides _Spongilla_ in which the details of development from
gemmules have been traced is that of _Tethya_.[259] Mere microscopic
examination of a _Tethya_ in active reproduction would suggest that the
process was simple budding, but Maas has shown that the offspring arise
from groups of archaeocytes in the cortex, that is to say, they are typical
gemmules. As they develop they migrate outwards along the radial
spicule-bundles {231}and are finally freed, like the buds of the
Hexactinellid _Lophocalyx_ (Fig. 113).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account