The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 03 (of 10)Cooke, A. H. (Alfred Hands)
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 03 (of 10)
Cooke, A. H. (Alfred Hands)
Animals
It is a mistake to assert that the young _Glochidium_ can swim. When
they finally quit the mother, they sink to the bottom, and there
remain resting on their dorsal side, with the valves gaping upwards and
the so-called byssus streaming up into the water above them. There they
remain, until a convenient ‘host’ comes within reach, and if no ‘host’
comes within a certain time, they perish. They are evidently peculiarly
sensitive to the presence of fish, but whether they perceive them by
smell or some other sense is unknown. “The tail of a recently killed
stickleback thrust into a watch-glass containing _Glochidium_ throws
them all into the wildest agitation for a few seconds; the valves are
violently closed and again opened with astonishing rapidity for 15–25
seconds, and then the animals appear exhausted and lie placid with
widely gaping shells--unless they chance to have closed upon any object
in the water (_e.g._ another _Glochidium_), in which case the valves
remain firmly closed.”
In about four weeks after the _Glochidium_ has quitted its host, and
the permanent shell has made its appearance _within_ the two valves
of the _Glochidium_, the projecting teeth of the latter press upon
the ventral edge of the permanent shell, at a point about half way in
its lengthward measurement, retarding the growth of the shell at that
particular point, and indenting its otherwise uninterrupted curve with
an irregular notch or dent. As growth proceeds, this dent becomes less
and less perceptible on the ventral margin of the shell itself, but its
effects may be detected, in well-preserved specimens, by the wavy turn
in the lines of growth, especially near the umbones of the young shell.
Mr. Latter found that all species of fish with which he experimented
had a strong dislike to _Glochidium_ as an article of food. Sometimes
a fish would taste it “just to try,” but invariably spit it out again
in a very decided manner. The cause of unpleasantness seemed not to be
the irritation produced in the mouth of the fish by the attempt of the
_Glochidium_ to attach itself, but was more probably due to what the
fish considered a nasty taste or odour in the object of his attentions.
* * * * *
The following works will be found useful for further study of this
portion of the subject:--
=F. M. Balfour=, Comparative Embryology, vol. i. pp. 186–241.
=F. Blochmann=, Ueber die Entwickelung von Neritina fluviatilis
Müll.: Zeit. wiss. Zool. xxxvi. (1881), pp. 125–174.
=L. Boutan=, Recherches sur l’anatomie et le développement de la
Fissurelle: Arch. Zool. exp. gén. (2) iii. suppl. (1885), 173
pp.
=W. K. Brooks=, The development of the Squid (Loligo Pealii
Les.): Anniv. Mem. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist. 1880.
„ „ The development of the oyster: Studies Biol. Lab. Johns
Hopk. Univ. i. (1880), 80 pp.
=R. von Erlanger=, Zur Entwickelung von Paludina vivipara:
Morph. Jahrb. xvii. (1891), pp. 337–379, 636–680.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account