The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 03 (of 10)Cooke, A. H. (Alfred Hands)
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 03 (of 10)
Cooke, A. H. (Alfred Hands)
Animals
According to other observers the starfish seizes the oyster with two
of his fingers, while with the other three he files away the edge of
the flat or upper valve until the points of contact with the round
valve are reduced almost to nothing; then he can introduce an arm, and
the rest is easy work. Others suggest that the starfish suffocates the
oyster by applying two of its fingers so closely to the edge of the
valves that the oyster is unable to open them; after a while the vital
powers relax and the shell gapes. The Rev. J. G. Wood holds[225] that
the starfish pours a secretion from its mouth which “paralyses the
hinge muscle and causes the shell to open.” Sometimes in a single night
a whole bed of oysters will be totally destroyed by an invasion of
starfish. Another dreaded enemy is the ‘whelk,’ a term which includes
_Purpura lapillus_, _Murex erinaceus_, _Buccinum undatum_, and probably
also _Nassa reticulata_. All these species perforate the shell with the
end of their radula, and then suck out the contents through the neatly
drilled hole. Skate fish are the cause of terrible destruction in the
open beds, and a scarcely less dangerous visitant is the octopus. Crabs
crush the young shells with their claws, and are said to gather in
bands and scratch sand or mud over the larger specimens, which makes
them open their shells. Yet another, and perhaps unconscious, foe is
found in the common mussel, which takes up room meant for the young
oysters, grows over the larger individuals, and harbours all sorts
of refuse between and under its closely packed ranks. _Cliona_, a
parasitic sponge, bores in between the layers of the oyster’s shell,
pitting them with tiny holes (corresponding to its _oscula_), and
disturbing the inmate, who has constantly to construct new layers of
shell from the inside. Weed, annelids, ‘blubber,’ shifting sand or
mud, sewage or any poisoning of the water, are seriously harmful to
the oyster’s best interests. A very severe winter is often the cause
of wholesale destruction in the beds. According to the _Daily News_ of
26th March 1891, the Whitstable oyster companies lost property to the
value of £30,000 in the exceptionally cold winter of 1890–91, when, on
the coast of Kent, the surface temperature of the sea sank below 32°,
and the advancing tide pushed a small ice-floe before it. Two million
oysters were laid down in one week of the following spring, to make up
for the loss. During the severe winter of 1892–93 extraordinary efforts
were made at Hayling I. to protect the oysters from the frost. Twenty
million oysters were placed in ponds for the winter, and a steam-engine
was for days employed to keep the ponds thawed and supplied with water,
while large coal and coke fires were kept burning at the edge of the
ponds.[226] On the other hand, the unusually warm and sunny summer
of 1893 is said to have resulted in the finest fall of spat known in
Whitstable for fifty years.[227]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account