The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 04 (of 10)Warburton, Cecil
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 04 (of 10)
Warburton, Cecil
Animals
FIG. 82.—_Gnathia maxillaris_. =A=, Segmented larva, × 10; =B=,
Praniza larva, × 5; =C=, gravid female, × 5; =D=, male, × 5.
]
=Fam. 2. Gnathiidae.=[100]—These forms appear to be related to the
Anthuridae; they are ectoparasitic on various kinds of fish during
larval life, but on assuming the adult state they do not feed any more,
subsisting merely on the nourishment amassed during the larval periods.
The larvae themselves are continually leaving their hosts, and can be
taken in great numbers living freely among weeds on the sea-bottom. The
larvae, together with the adults of _Gnathia maxillaris_, are extremely
abundant among the roots of the sea-weed _Poseidonia cavolinii_ in the
Bay of Naples. The young larvae hatch out from the body of the female in
the state shown in Fig. 82, A. This minute larva fixes upon a fish, and
after a time it is transformed into the so-called Praniza larva (B), in
which the gut is so distended with the fluid sucked from the host that
the segmentation in the hind part of the thorax is entirely lost. When
this larva moults it may, however, reacquire temporarily its
segmentation. After a certain period of this parasitic mode of life the
Praniza finally abandons its host, and becomes transformed into the
adult male or female. This may take place at very different stages in
the growth of the larva, the range of variation in size of the adults
being 1–8 mm., and it must be remembered that when once the adult
condition is assumed growth entirely ceases. What it is that determines
the stage of growth in each individual when it shall be transformed into
the adult is not known. The males and females differ from one another so
extraordinarily that it was for long denied that they were both derived
from the Praniza larvae. This is nevertheless the case. The change from
the Praniza to the female (Fig. 82, C) is not very great. The ovary
absorbs all the nourishment in the gut and comes to occupy the whole of
the body, all the other organs degenerating, including the alimentary
canal and mouth-parts. Indeed, only the limbs with their muscles and the
nervous system remain. The change to the male (D) is more radical. The
food is here stored in the liver, which increases in the male just as
the ovary does in the female. The segmentation is reacquired, and the
massive square head is formed from the hinder part of the head in the
Praniza, the anterior portion with its stylet-like appendages being
thrown away. The powerful nippers of the male are not formed inside the
cases of the old styliform mandibles, but are independent and possibly
not homologous organs. The meaning of the marked sexual dimorphism and
the use of the males’ nippers are not in the least known, though the
animals are easy to keep under observation. In captivity the males never
take the slightest notice of either larval or adult females.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account