The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 04 (of 10)Warburton, Cecil
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 04 (of 10)
Warburton, Cecil
Animals
Progressive stages in degeneration, correlated with the depth in which
the animals are found, are afforded by closely related species, or even
by individuals of apparently the same species. Thus in the large
Serolidae of Antarctic seas, _Serolis schytei_ occurs in 7–128 metres,
and has well-developed eyes; _S. bronleyana_, from 730 to 3600 metres,
has small and semi-degenerate eyes; while _S. antarctica_ in 730–2920
metres is completely blind. _Lispognathus thompsoni_ is a deep-water
spider-crab, and the individuals taken at various depths are said to
exhibit progressive stages in degeneration according to the depth from
which they come.
At the same time many anomalies occur which are difficult to explain. In
the middle depths, _i.e._ at about 100 fathoms, side by side with
species which have semi-degenerate or, at any rate, poorly pigmented
eyes, occur species with intensely pigmented eyes composed of very
numerous ommatidia, _e.g._ the Galatheid _Munidopsis_ and several
shrimps, while in the true abysses many of the species have quite normal
pigmented eyes. This is especially the case with the deep-sea Pagurids,
of which Alcock describes only one species, _Parapylocheles scorpio_, as
having poorly pigmented eyes. An attempt to account for this was made by
Milne Edwards and Bouvier,[119] who pointed out that the truly deep-sea
forms with well-developed eyes were always Crustacea of a roving habit,
which were perhaps capable of penetrating into better lit regions, and
to whom well-developed eyes might be useful, while the degenerate forms
were sluggish. This explanation cannot be held to account for the
phenomenon, as too many deep-sea forms with fairly normal eyes are known
which are never taken outside deep waters. Doflein (_loc. cit._) points
out that in the Brachyura of the deep sea there is a remarkable
correlation between the degree of degeneration of the eye and the size
of the eggs—the large-egged forms having unpigmented and degenerate
eyes, while the species with small eggs have pigmented eyes. He supposes
that the species with large eggs undergo a direct development without
pelagic free-swimming larvae, and that since they never reach the
surface their eyes never meet with the necessary stimulus of light for
the development of pigment; whereas the small-egged species undergo a
pelagic larval existence when this stimulus is present and gives the
necessary initiative for the development of the pigment.
Another factor enters into the question of eye-degeneration in the
Crustacea. The great majority of deep-sea animals, including many
deep-sea Crustacea, are phosphorescent, and it is certain that although
daylight never penetrates into the abysses of the ocean, yet there is
considerable illumination derived from the phosphorescence of the
inhabitants of these regions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account