The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 04 (of 10)Warburton, Cecil
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 04 (of 10)
Warburton, Cecil
Animals
If we except the Crayfishes and River-crabs, the Crustacean fauna of
running water is exceedingly poor, but in all standing fresh-water, from
the smallest pond to the large lakes and inland seas, Crustacea,
especially Entomostraca, are abundant and characteristic, and form an
important item in the food of fresh-water fishes. In small ponds a vast
assemblage of Cladocera is met with; these animals multiply with great
rapidity by parthenogenesis, especially during spring and summer, but on
the advent of untoward conditions sexual individuals are produced, which
lay fertilised winter-eggs which lie dormant until favourable conditions
again arise. As Weismann first pointed out, the frequency with which
sexual individuals are produced in the various species is closely
correlated with the liability of the water in which they live to dry up;
so that the Cladocera which inhabit small ponds usually have at least
two “epidemics” of sexual individuals, one during early summer and the
other before the onset of winter.
Besides Cladocera, the Phyllopoda (e.g. _Apus_, _Artemia_, etc.) inhabit
small pools; and also a great number of Cyclopidae. Of the other
fresh-water families of Copepoda, viz. Centropagidae and Harpacticidae,
inhabitants of small pieces of water are _Diaptomus castor_, as opposed
to the other species of _Diaptomus_ which are pelagic, and a number of
Harpacticidae (_Canthocamptus_), the members of this family living in
the weed or mud of either small ponds or else on the shores of the
larger lakes. The greater number of Ostracoda are found in similar
situations.
A district like the Broads of Norfolk, which consists partly of
slowly-moving streams and partly of extensive stretches of shallow
water, supports a Crustacean fauna intermediate in character between
that found in small ponds and the truly pelagic fauna characteristic of
deep lakes. A very complete list of the Crustacea of the Norfolk Broads,
with an interesting commentary on their distribution, is given by Mr.
Robert Gurney.[165] We miss here the pelagic Cladocera, such as
_Leptodora_, _Bythotrephes_, _Holopedium_, etc., which form so
characteristic a feature of large lakes; at the same time, besides a
rich development of the Cladocera, Cyclopidae, and Harpacticidae, which
haunt the weeds and mud of shallow waters, we find such species as
_Polyphemus pediculus_ and _Bosmina longirostris_ among Cladocera, which
are otherwise confined to large bodies of water, and a few pelagic
_Diaptomus_, e.g. _D. gracilis_. The fauna is also complicated in this
district by the proximity to the sea and the frequently high salinity of
the water, which allows a number of typically marine Copepods to pass up
the estuaries and intermingle with typically fresh-water species; such
are _Eurytemora affinis_ among the Centropagidae, and several species of
Harpacticidae (see p. 62).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account