The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 04 (of 10)Warburton, Cecil
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 04 (of 10)
Warburton, Cecil
Animals
=Fam. 3. Peltiidae.=[44]—This is an interesting family, allied to the
Harpacticidae, and includes species with flattened bodies somewhat
resembling Isopods, and a similar habit of rolling themselves up into
balls. No parasitic forms are known, though _Sunaristes paguri_ on the
French and Scottish coasts is said to live commensally with
hermit-crabs.
We have now enumerated the chief families of free-living Copepods; the
rest are either true parasites or else spend a part of their lives as
such. A number of the semi-parasitic and parasitic Copepods can be
placed in the tribe Ampharthrandria owing to the characters of their
antennae; but it must be remembered that many parasitic forms have given
up using the antennae as clasping organs; however, the sexual
differences in the antennae, and the fact that many of the species which
have lost the prehensile antennae in the male have near relations which
preserve it, enable us to proceed with some certainty. The adoption of
this classification necessitates our separating many families which
superficially may seem to resemble one another, _e.g._ the
semi-parasitic families Lichomolgidae and Ascidicolidae, and the
Dichelestiidae from the other fish-parasites; it also necessitates our
treating the presence of a sucking mouth as of secondary importance.
This characteristic must certainly, however, have been acquired more
than once in the history of the Copepods, for instance in the
Asterocheridae and in the fish-parasites, while it sometimes happens
that genera belonging to a typically Siphonostomatous group possess a
gnathostome, or biting mouth, _e.g._ _Ratania_ among the Asterocheridae.
Again, it is impossible even if we use the character of the mouth as a
criterion to place together all the true parasites on fishes in one
natural group, because the Bomolochidae and Chondracanthidae, which are
otherwise closely similar to the rest of the fish-parasites, possess no
siphon. It seems plain, therefore, that the parasitic habit has been
acquired several times separately by diverging stocks of free-swimming
Copepods, and that it has resulted in the formation of convergent
structures.
[Illustration:
FIG. 30.—_Haemocera danae_, × 40. =A=, Side view ♀; =B=, ventral view
♂. _Ant.1_, 1st antenna; _e_, eye; _ov_, ovary; _ovd_, oviduct;
_St_, stomach; _Th.1_, 1st thoracic appendage; _Th.5_, 5th thoracic
segment; _vd_, vas deferens. (After Malaquin.)
]
[Illustration:
FIG. 31.—Free-swimming Nauplius larva of _Haemocera danae_; _Ant.1_,
_Ant.2_, 1st and 2nd antennae; _e_, remains of eye; _Md_, mandible.
(After Malaquin.)
]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account