The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 05 (of 10)Sedgwick, Adam
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 05 (of 10)
Sedgwick, Adam
Animals
The divisions of inferior value to the Order are, after repeated scrutiny
by many naturalists, becoming of a more satisfactory character, and
notwithstanding various anomalies, may be, many of them, considered fairly
natural.[111] Unfortunately entomologists have not been able to agree on a
system of terminology, so that for these subdivisions terms such as
sub-order, series, legion, section, tribe, etc., are used by different
authorities in ways so various as to cause much confusion. In the following
pages the terms sub-order and series will be used in a somewhat vague
manner, the term sub-order being preferred where the group appears to be an
important one and of a fairly natural character, while the word series will
be adopted when the groups are connected in a conventional manner. The
designation "family" will be used for groups of subordinate importance; and
as regards this term we may remark that systematic entomologists are making
genuine efforts to define the "families" in an accurate and comprehensible
manner. The endeavour to make these systematic {178}families dependent
throughout the Class Insecta on characters of similar morphological value
has, however, scarcely been entered on, and it is perhaps not desirable,
seeing how very small a portion of the Insects of the world have been
critically examined, that much effort should be yet expended on an attempt
of the kind. It must be admitted that the species of Insects should be
obtained before they can be satisfactorily classified, and it is
estimated[112] that at least nine-tenths of the Insects of the world are
still unknown to entomologists.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account