The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 05 (of 10)Sedgwick, Adam
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 05 (of 10)
Sedgwick, Adam
Animals
It is, indeed, a matter of great difficulty to decide as to the exact
function of these ear-like acoustic organs, which, we may remind the
reader, are peculiar to the saltatorial Orthoptera, and we must refer for a
full discussion of the subject to Graber's masterly works,[218] contenting
ourselves with a brief outline, which we may commence by saying that the
Orthoptera with ears are believed to be sensitive to sounds by means other
than these organs. This suggests that the latter exist for some purpose of
perception of special sound. But if so what can this be? Only the males
possess, so far as we know, effective sound-producing organs, but both
sexes have the special ears; moreover, these structures are present in
numerous species where we do not know of the existence of phonetic organs
in either sex. Thus it appears at present impossible to accept these organs
as being certainly special structures for the perception of the music of
the species. It is generally thought that the females are charmed by the
music of the males, and that these are stimulated to rivalry by the
production of the sounds; and Dufour[219] has suggested that this process
reacts on the physiological processes of the individual. There has not been
a sufficient amount of observation to justify us in accepting these views,
and they do not in any way dispose of the difficulty arising from the
existence of the acoustic organs in species that do not, so far as we know,
produce special sounds. It is possible that the solution of the difficulty
may be found in the fact that these apparently dumb species do really
produce some sound, though we are quite ignorant as to their doing so. It
is well known that sounds inaudible to some human ears are perfectly
distinct to others. Tyndall, in his work on Sound, has illustrated this by
a fact that is of special interest from our present point of view.
"Crossing {287}the Wengern Alp with a friend," he says, "the grass on each
side of the path swarmed with Insects which to me rent the air with their
shrill chirruping. My friend heard nothing of this, the Insect world lying
beyond his limit of audition." If human ears are so different in their
capacities for perceiving vibrations, it of course becomes more probable
that auditory organs so differently constituted as are those of Insects
from our own may hear sounds when the best human ear can detect nothing
audible. On the whole, therefore, it would appear most probable that the
Orthoptera provided with acoustic organs, and which we consider dumb, are
not really so, but produce sounds we cannot hear, and do so in some manner
unknown to us. If this be the case it is probable that these ears are
special organs for hearing particular sounds.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account