The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 05 (of 10)Sedgwick, Adam
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 05 (of 10)
Sedgwick, Adam
Animals
A table of the birds and mammals on which Mallophaga have been found,
together with the names of the latter, has been given by Giebel.[274] The
classification of the group, so far as the principal divisions are
concerned, by no means accords with the kind of animals that serve as
hosts, for the only two genera peculiar to quadrupeds (_Trichodectes_, Fig.
220; and _Gyropus_) belong to the two chief divisions of Mallophaga. The
genus _Menopon_ includes numerous species found on birds, and three or four
others peculiar to mammals.
Two very natural divisions, Philopterides and Liotheides, were adopted by
Giebel and Nitzsch, but unfortunately the chief character they made use of
for diagnosing the two groups—the presence or absence of maxillary
palpi—was illusory. Apparently the labial palps will serve the purpose of
distinguishing the two divisions, they being present in the Liotheides and
absent in the Philopterides. A table of the characters of the avicolous
genera of these two groups is given by Grosse.[275]
The Liotheides are more active Insects, and leave their host after its
death to seek another. But the Philopterides do not do so, and die in about
three days after the death of their host. Possibly Mallophaga may be
transferred from one bird to another {351}by means of the parasitic
two-winged flies that infest birds. The writer has recorded[276] a case in
which a specimen of one of these bird-flies captured on the wing was found
to have some Mallophaga attached to it.
We should perhaps point out that these Mallophaga, though called bird-lice,
have nothing to do with the true lice which are so frequently found with
them, and that live by sucking the blood of their hosts. It would in fact
be better to drop the name of bird-lice altogether, and call the Mallophaga
biting lice. _Trichodectes latus_, according to this method, would be known
as the biting louse of the dog, the true or sucking louse of which animal
is _Haematopinus piliferus_, and belongs to the anoplurous division of
Hemiptera.
FAM. II. EMBIIDAE.
_Elongate feeble Insects; with small prothorax, elongate meso- and
meta-thorax, which may either bear wing or be without them. In the former
case these organs are not caducous, are delicately membranous, and all of
one consistence, with three or four indefinite longitudinal nervures and
a few cross-veinlets. The development is incompletely known. The
individuals do not form organised societies._
[Illustration: FIG. 222.—_Oligotoma michaeli._ (After M‘Lachlan.)]
The Embiidae are one of the smallest families of Insects; not more than
twenty species are known from all parts of the world, and it is probable
that only a few hundred actually exist. They are small and feeble Insects
of unattractive appearance, and shrivel so much after death as to render it
difficult to ascertain their characters. They require a warm climate. Hence
{352}it is not a matter for surprise that little should be known about
them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account