The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 05 (of 10)Sedgwick, Adam
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 05 (of 10)
Sedgwick, Adam
Animals
can, however, be very frequently actually demonstrated, so that it is
correct to speak of ten as the normal number.
{88}[Illustration: FIG. 47—Diagram of exterior of insect: the two vertical
dotted lines indicate the divisions between H, head; T, thorax; and A,
abdomen: _a_, antenna; _b_, labrum; _c_, mandible; _d_, maxillary palpus;
_e_, labial palpus; _f_, facetted eye; _g_, pronotum; _h_, mesonotum; _i_,
metanotum; _k_, wings; _l_{1}_ to _l_{10}_, abdominal segments; _m_, the
internal membranous portions uniting the apparently separated segments;
_n_, cerci; _o_, stigma; _p_, abdominal pleuron bearing small stigmata;
_q_{1}_, _q_{2}_, _q_{3}_, pro-, meso-, meta-sterna; _r_{1}_, mesothoracic
episternum; _s_{1}_, epimeron, these two forming the mesopleuron; _r_{2}_,
_s_{2}_, metathoracic episternum and epimeron; _t_, coxa; _v_, trochanter;
_w_, femur; _x_, tibia; _y_, tarsus; _z_, gula.]
It is no reproach to morphologists that they have not yet agreed as to the
number of segments that may be taken as typical for an Insect, for all the
branches of evidence bearing on the point are still imperfect. It may be
well, therefore, to state the most extreme views that appear to be at all
admissible. Hagen[18] has recently stated the opinion that each thoracic
segment consists really of three segments—an anterior or wing-bearer, a
middle or leg-bearer, and a posterior or stigma-bearer. There seems to be
no reason for treating the stigma as being at all of the nature of an
appendage, and the theory of a triple origin for these segments may be
dismissed. There are, however, several facts that indicate a duplicity in
these somites, among which we may specially mention the remarkable
constancy of two pleural pieces on each side of each thoracic segment. The
hypothesis of these rings being each the representative of two segments
cannot therefore be at present considered entirely untenable, and in that
case the maximum and minimum numbers that can be suggested appear to be
twenty-four and eleven, distributed as follows:—
Maximum. Minimum. {89}
Head 7 3
Thorax 6 3
Abdomen 11 5
-- --
Total 24 11
Although it is not probable that ultimately so great a difference as these
figures indicate will be found to prevail, it is certainly at present
premature to say that all Insects are made up of the same number of primary
segments.
A brief account of the structure of the integument will be found in the
chapter dealing with the post-embryonic development.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account