The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 06 (of 10)Sharp, David
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 06 (of 10)
Sharp, David
Animals
FAM. 77. BRUCHIDAE.—_Prosternum extremely short; in front perpendicular;
behind the coxae, forming merely a transverse lamina with pointed
extremity. Hind femora more or less {277}thickened._ This comparatively
small family includes about 700 species of small, unattractive beetles. The
larvae live in seeds; hence some of the species are liable to be
transported by means of commerce; some of them do considerable injury; peas
and beans being specially subject to their attacks. They are able to
complete their growth with a very small amount of nutriment, some of them
consuming only a portion a little larger than themselves of a bean or pea.
The larvae are fat maggots without legs, but Riley has discovered that the
young larvae of _Bruchus pisi_ and _B. fabae_ have, when first hatched,
three pairs of legs which are subsequently lost. They also have peculiar
spinous processes on the pronotum. Both of these characteristics may be
correlative with the transient differences in the activities of the larva,
for the little creature is not at first located in the pea, but mines a
gallery in the pod, in which it moves about, subsequently entering the pea
and losing its legs. There is a good deal of difference in these respects
between the two species—_B. pisi_ and _B. fabae_—examined by Riley, and as
but little is known of the life-histories of other Bruchidae it is probable
that still greater variety prevails. Heeger has found that _Bruchus lentis_
sometimes requires two seeds to enable it to complete its growth; it is,
notwithstanding its legless state when half-grown, able to migrate by
dropping to the earth, and dragging itself along by its mandibles till it
comes to another pod into which it bites its way.
[Illustration: Fig. 141—_Bruchus pisi_ or pea-weevil. A, Young larva; B,
prothoracic spinous process; C, post-embryonic leg, greatly magnified; D,
pea-pod, with tracks of entry; E, portion of pod, with egg, and the
subsequently formed track, magnified; F, imago. (After Riley.)]
The family has, until recently, been placed in the {278}Rhynchophorous
series, with which it has, however, no direct connection. On the other
hand, it is so closely connected with Chrysomelidae that it is not possible
to indicate good characters to distinguish the two at present. The
Australian genus _Carpophagus_, and the large South American species of
_Caryoborus_ appear to be quite indistinguishable as families, though
Lacordaire and Chapuis placed one in Bruchidae, the other in Chrysomelidae.
The definition we have given applies, therefore, to the majority of the
family, but not to the aberrant forms just mentioned. The European genus
_Urodon_ appears to belong to Anthribidae, not to Bruchidae. The family
Bruchidae is called Mylabridae by some.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account