The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 06 (of 10)Sharp, David
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 06 (of 10)
Sharp, David
Animals
other forms they are absent altogether (_Cossus_, _e.g._), and in
_Hepialus_ we have failed to detect any evidence of the existence of the
maxillae. On the other hand, in _Micropteryx_ the maxillae are much more
like those of a mandibulate Insect; and various other Microlepidoptera
approach more or less a similar condition. In the genus last mentioned
{310}the maxillary palpi are largely developed, flexible and slender.
According to Walter various forms of palpus intermediate between that of
_Micropteryx_ and the condition of rudimentary tubercle may be found
amongst the Microlepidoptera.[169]
LABIUM.—The labial palpi are usually largely developed, though but little
flexible; they form conspicuous processes densely covered with scales or
hairs, and curve forwards or upwards, rarely downwards, from the under side
of the head, somewhat in the fashion of tusks. The other parts of the
labium are frequently represented merely by a membranous structure, united
with the maxillae and obstructing the cavity of the pharynx. Where the
proboscis is absent it is difficult to find any orifice leading to the
alimentary canal, such opening as may exist being concealed by the
overhanging clypeus and labium. In some forms, _Saturnia_, _e.g._, there
appears to be no buccal orifice whatever. In _Hepialus_ the labium is in a
very unusual condition; it projects externally in the position usually
occupied by the labial palpi, these organs being themselves extremely
short. It is very difficult to form an opinion as to the structure of the
labium and other mouth-parts when the maxillae are not developed, as in
these cases the parts are of a delicate membranous nature, and shrivel
after death. This is the explanation of the fact that in descriptive works
we find vague terms in use such as "mouth aborted" or "tongue absent."
The mouth of the Lepidopterous imago is a paradoxical structure; it differs
very greatly from that of the larva, the changes during metamorphosis being
extreme. We should thus be led to infer that it is of great importance to
the creatures; but, on the other hand, the various structures that make up
the mouth, as we have remarked, are frequently absent or reduced to
insignificant proportions; and even in forms where the apparatus is highly
developed the individuals seem to be able to accomplish oviposition without
taking food, or after taking only very minute quantities. It is therefore
difficult to understand why so great a change should occur during the
metamorphosis of the Insects of this Order. It has been ascertained that in
some forms where the mouth is atrophied the stomach is in a correlative
condition; but we are not aware that any investigations have been made as
to whether this correspondence is general or exceptional.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account