The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 06 (of 10)Sharp, David
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 06 (of 10)
Sharp, David
Animals
The wings are very rarely absent in Lepidoptera; this occurs only in the
female sex, no male Lepidopterous imago destitute of wings having been
discovered. Although but little is known of the physiology of flight of
Lepidoptera, yet it is clearly important that the two wings of the same
side should be perfectly coadapted or correlated. This is effected largely
by the front wing overlapping the hind one to a considerable extent, and by
the two contiguous surfaces being pressed, as it were, together. This is
the system found in butterflies and in some of the large moths, such as
Lasiocampidae and Saturniidae; in these cases the hind {316}wing always has
a large shoulder, or area, anterior to its point of insertion. In most
moths this shoulder is absent, but in its place there are one or more stiff
bristles projecting forwards and outwards, and passing under a little
membranous flap, or a tuft of thick scales on the under face of the front
wing; the bristle is called the "frenulum," the structure that retains it a
"retinaculum." In _Castnia_ (Fig. 162) and in some Sphingidae there is the
unusual condition of a highly-developed shoulder (_s_) coexisting with a
perfect frenulum (_f_) and retinaculum (_r_). The frenulum and retinaculum
usually differ in structure, and the retinaculum in position, in the two
sexes of the same moth; the male, which in moths has superior powers of
flight, having the better retaining organs. Hampson says "the form of the
frenulum is of great use in determining sex, as in the males of all the
forms that possess it, it consists of hairs firmly soldered together so as
to form a single bristle, whilst in nearly all females it consists of three
or more bristles which are shorter than that of the male; in one female
Cossid I have found as many as nine. Also in the large majority of moths
the retinaculum descends from the costal nervure in the male, while in the
female it ascends from the median nervure."[176] This sexual difference in
a structure for the discharge of a function common to the two sexes is a
very remarkable fact. There are a few—very few—moths in which the bases of
the hind wings are not well coadapted with the front wings, and do not
possess a frenulum, and these species possess a small more or less free
lobe at the base of the front wing that droops towards the hind wing, and
may thus help to keep up an imperfect connexion between the pair; this lobe
has been named a jugum by Professor Comstock. Occasionally there is a jugum
on the hind as well as on the front wing. There is usually a very great
difference between the front and the hind wings; for whereas in the front
wing the anterior portion is doubtless of great importance in the act of
flight and is provided with numerous veins, in the hind wing, on the other
hand, the corresponding part has not a similar function, being covered by
the front wing; hence the hind wing is provided with fewer nervures in the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account