The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 07 (of 10)Boulenger, George Albert
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 07 (of 10)
Boulenger, George Albert
Animals
With reference to the fossil Dipnoi, it may be stated that, so far as they
are known, the cranial roofing bones are more numerous than in the existing
genera, and they cannot readily be compared with those of the latter, or
with the numerically reduced and more definitely arranged bones of most
Teleostomi. There is also evidence that in some fossil Dipnoi (e.g.
_Dipterus_) the chondrocranium and the mandibular suspensorium
(palato-quadrate) must have been replaced by cartilage bones to an extent
which has no parallel in any of the surviving types.[208] Jugular bones
were present in _Dipterus_ and _Phaneropleuron_.
{234}MEDIAN FINS AND APPENDICULAR SKELETON
[Illustration: FIG. 135.—The cartilaginous radialia of the first dorsal fin
of _Mustelus antarcticus_. (From Mivart.)]
THE MEDIAN FINS.—Whether existing in the form of a continuous fin, or as
discontinuous isolated fins, the median fins are provided with skeletal
supports, and also with muscles, primitively formed from intrusive clusters
of cells derived from a variable number of the neighbouring myotomes, for
their varied movements. The skeletal structures of the dorsal and anal fins
consist of a series of bony or cartilaginous, rod-like, and typically
tri-segmented radial elements or pterygiophores,[209] supporting distally a
series of dermal structures in the shape of numerous slender horny fibres
or ceratotrichia, as in the Elasmobranchii and Holocephali, or a smaller
number of bony dermal fin-rays, which are probably modified scales or
lepidotrichia,[210] as in the Teleostomi. The typical tri-segmented
character of the radialia is often retained in many existing Elasmobranchs
(Fig. 135) and in _Pleuracanthus_, in _Neoceratodus_ amongst the Dipnoi, in
the Chondrostei, in existing Holostei (Fig. 136), and to a greater or less
extent in several families of Teleosts (_e.g._ Salmonidae, Esocidae,
Cyprinidae, and some Acanthopterygii); but in the latter group the radialia
are greatly prone to reduction, and hence they are more generally
bi-segmented, and sometimes consist of a single proximal segment only (e.g.
_Gymnotus_). In all these Fishes the proximal segments are the longest and
the most persistent, and when reduction occurs it is at the expense of the
middle and distal segments.
{235}[Illustration: FIG. 136.—The tri-segmented radialia and the fin-rays
of part of the dorsal fin of _Amia calva_. _p.s_, _m.s_, and _d.s_, The
proximal, middle, and distal segments of a radial; _f.r_, fin-rays. (From
Bridge.)
FIG. 137.—The first four radialia of the dorsal fin of _Mesoprion gembra_,
showing the chain-links for the ring-like bases of the fin-rays. _r.e^1_,
_r.e^4_, First and fourth proximal radialia.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account