The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 07 (of 10)Boulenger, George Albert
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 07 (of 10)
Boulenger, George Albert
Animals
From what has been said as to the structure of the spiral valve in the
different groups of Fishes, it may be concluded that the valve most nearly
retains its primitive condition in the Cyclostomata; attains its maximum
development in the Elasmobranchs, especially in the Notidanidae, and shows
no indication of degeneration in the Dipnoi. In the Holocephali and the
lower Teleostomi, on the other hand, the valve exhibits various stages of
retrogressive modification, and in the Teleosts is either absent altogether
or persists only as a vestigial structure in a very few species.
From a physiological point of view the object of the spiral valve is to
increase the absorptive inner surface of the intestine,[257] but, from what
has been said as to the structural variability of the valve, it is obvious
that its efficacy from a functional standpoint must be equally variable.
The value of the valve as an absorptive mechanism necessarily depends on
the area of absorption-surface which it provides, as well as on the degree
of resistance which it offers to the passage of food material along the
cavity of the intestine. These factors will in turn depend on the number of
coils, on the width of the valve, and on the extent to which its free
margin is deflected in forming the series of cones, but these again are
precisely the structural features which are most liable to variation. The
total absorption area in the four types of valve characteristic of the
genus _Raia_ has been calculated, and may be expressed in square
centimetres as follows:—A, 136.64; B, 143.82; C, 254.3; and D, 276.7.[258]
Hence as regards mere absorption area a spiral valve of the type D has
twice the extent of a valve of the type A, and if, in addition, account be
taken of the retardation of the food due to the increased obstruction
offered by the columella and cones in D, it is clear that the
{270}difference in physiological value between the two types must be far
more considerable than is indicated by a comparison of their relative
superficial areas alone.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account