The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 08 (of 10)Gadow, Hans
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 08 (of 10)
Gadow, Hans
Animals
A, C, D, E, THEROMORPHA. A, _Elginia_, p. 305; C, _Cynognathus_,
p. 306; D, _Gordonia_, p. 310; E, _Dicynodon_, p. 310.
B, G, PROSAURIA. B, _Sphenodon_, p. 294; G, _Palaeohatteria_, p. 291.
F, CROCODILIA, p. 434.
H, I, K, CHELONIA, p. 316. H, _Chelydra_, p. 338; I, _Chrysemys_,
p. 346; K, _Cistudo_, p. 361.
_E_, Epiotic; _F_, frontal; _IT_, infratemporal fossa; _J_, jugal, shaded
vertically; _L_, lacrymal; _M_, maxillary; _N_, nasal groove; _Na_, nasal
bone; _O_, orbit; _P_, parietal; _Po_, postorbital, dotted; _Pf_,
post-frontal; _Pm_, premaxillary; _Pr_, prefrontal; _Ptg_, pterygoid; _Q_,
quadrate; _Qj_, quadrato-jugal; _So_, supra-occipital; _Sq_, squamosal,
shaded obliquely; _St_ (in B-E), supratemporal fossa; _St_ (in A),
Supratemporal bone.]
{281}[Illustration: FIG. 55.–Diagrams of skulls, showing especially the
composition of the bony arches of the orbito-temporal region.
L, PYTHONOMORPHA. _Clidastes_, p. 490.
M, N, O, LACERTILIA, p. 496. M, _Varanus_, p. 543; N, _Uromastix_,
p. 524; O, _Lacerta_, p. 550.
P, ICHTHYOSAURIA, p. 479. _Ichthyosaurus_, p. 483.
Q, PTEROSAURIA, p. 484. _Dimorphodon_, p. 486.
R, AVES, generalised, for comparison.
S, MAMMALIA, generalised, for comparison.
T, OPHIDIA, p. 581.
_C_, Condyle of mandible; _Col_, columella cranii; _F_, frontal; _I_,
interparietal or pineal foramen; _I.A_, Inner angle of mandible; _J_,
jugal, shaded vertically; _L_, lacrymal; _M_, maxillary; _N_, nasal groove;
_Na_, nasal bone; _O_, orbit; _O_{1}_, preorbital fossa; _P_, parietal;
_Pf_, postfrontal; _Pm_, premaxillary; _Pr_, prefrontal; _Ptg_, pterygoid;
_Q_, quadrate; _Qj_, quadrato-jugal; _Sq_, squamosal, shaded obliquely;
_St_, supratemporal bone.]
{282}The families cannot well be changed, and terms like super-families and
super-orders are sometimes resorted to by those who do not like to look
stern facts in the face.
The sequence of the groups, although arranged as much as possible in
ascending order, is of necessity as unnatural as that of the maps in an
atlas. We cannot yet construct a satisfactory phyletic tree of the
Reptiles. The Proreptilia connect them with the Amphibia. Next follow the
Prosauria with _Sphenodon_ among the Prosauri as the key to most other
groups. Then follow the Theromorpha, and it is probable that from various
branches of these have arisen the Chelonia, Dinosauria, Crocodilia, and
Plesiosauria. The descent of the Ichthyosauria is very problematic. The
same applies to the Pterosauria and to the Pythonomorpha, but it is
possible that they, together with the Sauria, are connected with the
Prosauria.
With all reserve these hypothetical affinities may be expressed by the
following diagram:–
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account