The Campaign of Waterloo: A Military History: Third EditionRopes, John Codman
History
The Campaign of Waterloo: A Military History: Third Edition
Ropes, John Codman
Napoleon I, Emperor of the French, 1769-1821 -- Elba and the Hundred Days, 1814-1815; Waterloo, Battle of, Waterloo, Belgium, 1815
Lastly, while the Emperor expressly states in his letter to Grouchy
that he estimates that the Prussians can not oppose to him a force of
over forty thousand men, and while it may perhaps be inferred from
his letter to Ney that he thought that that officer would meet with
little or no opposition, it is to be observed that Napoleon acted in
all respects as if he expected that the enemy would be found in force.
Both Ney and Grouchy were explicitly directed to employ the whole of
their respective forces. We have spoken of this before as it affected
Ney. It was the same with the movement prescribed to Grouchy,—“Take
your right wing to Sombreffe,”—[305] _i.e._, the two _corps-d’armée_,
and the three cavalry corps. Whatever Napoleon may have conjectured as
to the force or intentions of the enemy, both of his movements this
forenoon,—that of the main army on Sombreffe, and that of the left wing
on Quatre Bras,—were to be made in force,—with all the force he could
muster. If he did expect, as some writers think, that his enemies would
retire before him, he at any rate made every preparation to fight and
overcome them, should they give him battle. It was in order, as we have
pointed out, that these movements might be made simultaneously, and in
sufficient force, that they were deferred to such a late period in the
day,—the backwardness of the 1st Corps having postponed for several
hours the concentration of the left wing.
It will be noticed that in none of these letters or formal orders is
the 6th Corps under the Count of Lobau mentioned. The inference is,
that, at that time, the Emperor desired to retain this body of troops
as a reserve for the whole army. He wanted to get along, if he could,
without employing it at all in the present stage of the campaign.
FOOTNOTES:
[290] Doc. Inéd., Heymès, p. 6.
[291] _Cf._ La Tour D’Auvergne, pp. 91, 92.
[292] Doc. Inéd., X, p. 32; App. C, xviii; _post_, pp. 377, 378.
[293] _Ante_, p. 121, note 23.
[294] _Ante_, p. 121, note 21.
[295] Doc. Inéd., XXI, p. 63; App. C, xxiii; _post_, p. 382.
[296] Ib., XI, pp. 37, 38; App. C, xix; _post_, p. 379.
[297] _Ante_, pp. 5, 13, 14.
[298] Ollech, p. 123.
[299] Corresp., vol. 28, p. 334. Doc. Inéd., X, p. 32; App. C, xviii;
_post_, pp. 377, 378.
[300] Flahaut, says Reille, passed through Gosselies about 10 A.M. Doc.
Inéd., XI, pp. 37, 38; App. C, xix; _post_, p. 379.
[301] This seems to imply that the Emperor did not propose to carry the
Guard to Gembloux.
[302] See _ante_, p. 123.
[303] Corresp., vol. 28, p. 336; App. C, xxiv; _post_, pp. 382, 383.
[304] Ollech, pp. 112, 113: D’Auvergne, pp. 103, 104: Charras, vol. 1,
pp. 143, 144.
[305] “_Rendez-vous avec cette aile droite à Sombreffe._”
_NOTES TO CHAPTER IX._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account