The Campaign of Waterloo: A Military History: Third EditionRopes, John Codman
History
The Campaign of Waterloo: A Military History: Third Edition
Ropes, John Codman
Napoleon I, Emperor of the French, 1769-1821 -- Elba and the Hundred Days, 1814-1815; Waterloo, Battle of, Waterloo, Belgium, 1815
And he directs Ney to be all ready to march to Brussels, as soon as he
(Napoleon) shall have arrived at a decision. But this decision, it is
to be observed, was not to be taken until the Prussians should either
have been attacked and defeated, or should have fallen back at least
as far as Gembloux.
To the same effect is the letter to Grouchy:[314]
“If the enemy is at Sombreffe I am going to attack him; I am going
to attack him even at Gembloux, and to carry even that position; my
intention being, after having explored (_connu_) these two positions,
to set out this night and to operate with my left wing, which is
under the command of Marshal Ney, against the English.”
It is plain from both these letters that to say that Napoleon was
“divided in his mind” between “pressing on direct to Brussels between
the two allied armies” and attacking the Prussians in front of him,—in
other words, that he was hesitating which of these two courses he would
take, is a statement utterly without foundation. In both despatches he
states unequivocally his immediate intention,—namely, to attack the
Prussians; and it was only after he should have attacked and driven
the Prussians and forced them as far to the eastward as Gembloux, that
he proposed to retrace his steps, to reinforce Ney, and march against
the English. Brussels, indeed, was regarded by Napoleon as perhaps the
most important result of the campaign, next to the enormous military
advantage which would be secured by the defeat or dispersion of the
armies of Wellington and Blücher. But this was all. For the Emperor to
gain Brussels, these hostile armies must either be attacked and beaten,
or else they must definitely separate, each retiring towards its own
base. The idea of passing between the two armies at this stage of the
campaign, and so arriving at Brussels, it is safe to say, never entered
Napoleon’s mind. His object, as Jomini[315] correctly states, was “not
to occupy Brussels, but to destroy the opposing masses in succession.”
FOOTNOTES:
[306] It is, however, given in Du Casse’s Vandamme, vol. 2, p. 562.
[307] Jomini, pp. 129, 130.
[308] Charras, vol. 1, pp. 138, 145, 182.
[309] Siborne, vol. 1, p. 85.
[310] The Duke of Wellington, however, thought the inactivity of
Napoleon on the morning of the 16th was necessitated by the long
marches of the past few days. Ellesmere, pp. 296, 297. So, Clausewitz,
ch. 25, p. 53.
[311] _Ante_, pp. 132, 139.
[312] Chesney, pp. 138, 139: See also, Clinton, p. 380.
[313] Corresp., vol. 28, p. 334: Doc. Inéd., X, p. 32; App. C, xviii;
_post_, pp. 377, 378.
[314] Corresp., vol. 28, p. 336; App. C, xxiv; _post_, pp. 382, 383.
[315] Jomini, p. 112.
CHAPTER X.
THE BATTLE OF LIGNY. BLÜCHER’S DECISION TO ACCEPT BATTLE NOT DEPENDENT
ON WELLINGTON’S ASSURANCE OF SUPPORT.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account